* [PATCH] perf_event: fix compile error
@ 2009-12-02 8:08 Xiao Guangrong
2009-12-02 8:17 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-12-02 8:31 ` [tip:perf/core] perf_event: Fix " tip-bot for Xiao Guangrong
0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Xiao Guangrong @ 2009-12-02 8:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ingo Molnar; +Cc: Peter Zijlstra, LKML
cc1: warnings being treated as errors
builtin-probe.c: In function ‘cmd_probe’:
builtin-probe.c:163: error: unused variable ‘fd’
Signed-off-by: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@cn.fujitsu.com>
---
tools/perf/builtin-probe.c | 3 ++-
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-probe.c b/tools/perf/builtin-probe.c
index b5d15cf..64ea038 100644
--- a/tools/perf/builtin-probe.c
+++ b/tools/perf/builtin-probe.c
@@ -160,7 +160,8 @@ static const struct option options[] = {
int cmd_probe(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix __used)
{
- int i, j, fd, ret;
+ int i, j, ret;
+ int fd __used;
struct probe_point *pp;
argc = parse_options(argc, argv, options, probe_usage,
--
1.6.1.2
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] perf_event: fix compile error
2009-12-02 8:08 [PATCH] perf_event: fix compile error Xiao Guangrong
@ 2009-12-02 8:17 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-12-02 8:21 ` Xiao Guangrong
2009-12-02 8:31 ` [tip:perf/core] perf_event: Fix " tip-bot for Xiao Guangrong
1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Ingo Molnar @ 2009-12-02 8:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Xiao Guangrong; +Cc: Peter Zijlstra, LKML
* Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@cn.fujitsu.com> wrote:
> cc1: warnings being treated as errors
> builtin-probe.c: In function ???cmd_probe???:
> builtin-probe.c:163: error: unused variable ???fd???
>
> Signed-off-by: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@cn.fujitsu.com>
> ---
> tools/perf/builtin-probe.c | 3 ++-
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-probe.c b/tools/perf/builtin-probe.c
> index b5d15cf..64ea038 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/builtin-probe.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-probe.c
> @@ -160,7 +160,8 @@ static const struct option options[] = {
>
> int cmd_probe(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix __used)
> {
> - int i, j, fd, ret;
> + int i, j, ret;
> + int fd __used;
> struct probe_point *pp;
i think it's better to initialize it to -1 instead of turning off the
warning.
Ingo
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] perf_event: fix compile error
2009-12-02 8:17 ` Ingo Molnar
@ 2009-12-02 8:21 ` Xiao Guangrong
2009-12-02 8:28 ` Ingo Molnar
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Xiao Guangrong @ 2009-12-02 8:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ingo Molnar; +Cc: Peter Zijlstra, LKML
Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@cn.fujitsu.com> wrote:
>
>> cc1: warnings being treated as errors
>> builtin-probe.c: In function ???cmd_probe???:
>> builtin-probe.c:163: error: unused variable ???fd???
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@cn.fujitsu.com>
>> ---
>> tools/perf/builtin-probe.c | 3 ++-
>> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-probe.c b/tools/perf/builtin-probe.c
>> index b5d15cf..64ea038 100644
>> --- a/tools/perf/builtin-probe.c
>> +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-probe.c
>> @@ -160,7 +160,8 @@ static const struct option options[] = {
>>
>> int cmd_probe(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix __used)
>> {
>> - int i, j, fd, ret;
>> + int i, j, ret;
>> + int fd __used;
>> struct probe_point *pp;
>
> i think it's better to initialize it to -1 instead of turning off the
> warning.
>
Hi Ingo,
I have try this way but the error still exists :-(
Thanks,
Xiao
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] perf_event: fix compile error
2009-12-02 8:21 ` Xiao Guangrong
@ 2009-12-02 8:28 ` Ingo Molnar
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Ingo Molnar @ 2009-12-02 8:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Xiao Guangrong; +Cc: Peter Zijlstra, LKML, Masami Hiramatsu
* Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@cn.fujitsu.com> wrote:
> Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > * Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@cn.fujitsu.com> wrote:
> >
> >> cc1: warnings being treated as errors
> >> builtin-probe.c: In function ???cmd_probe???:
> >> builtin-probe.c:163: error: unused variable ???fd???
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@cn.fujitsu.com>
> >> ---
> >> tools/perf/builtin-probe.c | 3 ++-
> >> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-probe.c b/tools/perf/builtin-probe.c
> >> index b5d15cf..64ea038 100644
> >> --- a/tools/perf/builtin-probe.c
> >> +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-probe.c
> >> @@ -160,7 +160,8 @@ static const struct option options[] = {
> >>
> >> int cmd_probe(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix __used)
> >> {
> >> - int i, j, fd, ret;
> >> + int i, j, ret;
> >> + int fd __used;
> >> struct probe_point *pp;
> >
> > i think it's better to initialize it to -1 instead of turning off the
> > warning.
> >
>
> Hi Ingo,
>
> I have try this way but the error still exists :-(
ah - unused, not uninitialized.
Then the right fix is to use NO_LIBDWARF, not __used annotation. I've
changed it to that and committed your fix - thanks!
Ingo
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [tip:perf/core] perf_event: Fix compile error
2009-12-02 8:08 [PATCH] perf_event: fix compile error Xiao Guangrong
2009-12-02 8:17 ` Ingo Molnar
@ 2009-12-02 8:31 ` tip-bot for Xiao Guangrong
1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: tip-bot for Xiao Guangrong @ 2009-12-02 8:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-tip-commits
Cc: linux-kernel, hpa, mingo, a.p.zijlstra, xiaoguangrong, tglx,
mhiramat, mingo
Commit-ID: bdad0db7dbdb37d0bb3c7d0f65cd3ff599ea6ecb
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/bdad0db7dbdb37d0bb3c7d0f65cd3ff599ea6ecb
Author: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@cn.fujitsu.com>
AuthorDate: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 16:08:41 +0800
Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
CommitDate: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 09:27:01 +0100
perf_event: Fix compile error
Fix:
cc1: warnings being treated as errors
builtin-probe.c: In function 'cmd_probe':
builtin-probe.c:163: error: unused variable 'fd'
Signed-off-by: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
LKML-Reference: <4B162089.8000907@cn.fujitsu.com>
[ v2: use NO_LIBDWARF instead of __used ]
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
---
tools/perf/builtin-probe.c | 5 ++++-
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-probe.c b/tools/perf/builtin-probe.c
index b5d15cf..a58e11b 100644
--- a/tools/perf/builtin-probe.c
+++ b/tools/perf/builtin-probe.c
@@ -160,7 +160,10 @@ static const struct option options[] = {
int cmd_probe(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix __used)
{
- int i, j, fd, ret;
+ int i, j, ret;
+#ifndef NO_LIBDWARF
+ int fd;
+#endif
struct probe_point *pp;
argc = parse_options(argc, argv, options, probe_usage,
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-12-02 8:32 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-12-02 8:08 [PATCH] perf_event: fix compile error Xiao Guangrong
2009-12-02 8:17 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-12-02 8:21 ` Xiao Guangrong
2009-12-02 8:28 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-12-02 8:31 ` [tip:perf/core] perf_event: Fix " tip-bot for Xiao Guangrong
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox