From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754491AbZLBODD (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Dec 2009 09:03:03 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754429AbZLBODD (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Dec 2009 09:03:03 -0500 Received: from one.firstfloor.org ([213.235.205.2]:43400 "EHLO one.firstfloor.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753707AbZLBODC (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Dec 2009 09:03:02 -0500 Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 15:03:05 +0100 From: Andi Kleen To: Wu Fengguang Cc: Andi Kleen , Andrew Morton , Nick Piggin , "linux-mm@kvack.org" , LKML Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/24] HWPOISON: make it possible to unpoison pages Message-ID: <20091202140305.GL18989@one.firstfloor.org> References: <20091202031231.735876003@intel.com> <20091202043045.150526892@intel.com> <20091202131530.GG18989@one.firstfloor.org> <20091202134645.GA19274@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20091202134645.GA19274@localhost> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > btw, do you feel comfortable with the interface name "renew-pfn"? > (versus "unpoison-pfn") I prefer unpoison, that makes it clear what it is. Maybe even call it "software_unpoison_pfn", because it won't unpoison on the hardware level (this really should be documented somewhere too) -Andi -- ak@linux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.