public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca>,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com, randy.dunlap@oracle.com,
	wcohen@redhat.com, tglx@linutronix.de, jbaron@redhat.com,
	mhiramat@redhat.com, linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][tip/perf/core] tracing: Rename TRACE_EVENT and others to something resonable
Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 21:16:38 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091202201635.GA5141@nowhere> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1259784683.12870.100.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com>

On Wed, Dec 02, 2009 at 03:11:23PM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> With the addition of TRACE_EVENT templates (or classes) the issue of
> naming has come up.
> 
> Originally, the template was called TRACE_EVENT_TEMPLATE. This was to be
> used to consolidate similar TRACE_EVENTs because a single TRACE_EVENT
> takes up quite a bit of code. One TRACE_EVENT creates a function to
> register and unregister a trace point, a function to record the event in
> a buffer, a function to display the binary output to user space, a
> function to add counters to record the number of times the event is
> reached, and so on.
> 
> All these functions creates a lot of bloat, especially since these
> functions are almost identical to each other. Unfortunately, these
> functions require specific parameters and structure fields, and can't
> always be the same. But for those events that share the same structure
> and parameters, a class/template allows them to share the same functions
> and this cuts down the bloat substantially.
> 
> But what to call these macros to satisfy the already confused kernel
> developers?
> 
> Ideally, DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS to create the class, DEFINE_EVENT to create
> an instance of the class, and even DEFINE_EVENT_CLASS to replace the
> current TRACE_EVENT that defines a class and creates an event of the
> same name as the class. New DEFINE_EVENTs may also reference a class
> declared by DEFINE_EVENT_CLASS.
> 
> But us kernel developers stay up too late at night, drinking jolt (or
> beer if you are in Europe), and our brain cells have fused to only
> logical circuitry, thus understanding concepts that are not engraved in
> stone becomes a bit too straining for us, and we may finally have to
> give up on solving this one last bug to get some rest with our love one
> that's been sleeping since 9pm.
> 
> This means using DECLARE_* and DEFINE_* will push us over that brink to
> normalcy and must be avoided. A new name must be established to clearly
> describe the mystical CPP magic that comprises the TRACE_EVENT hackery.
> Something that can bring us back to our roots. Something where it all
> begins. The stone age.
> 
> Thus, this patch renames the MACROS to the most obvious definitions
> around. Something we should have thought of at the start.
> 
> 
> s/DEFINE_EVENT_CLASS/FRED/g
> s/DEFINE_EVENT/WILMA/g
> s/TRACE_EVENT/BARNEY/g
> 
> 
> Thus with the new naming convention:
> 
> FRED(x, ...) -- will declare a class but will not make any events
> WILMA(x, y, ...) -- will create an event based off of class made by FRED
> BARNEY(x, ...) -- will create both a class and an event
> 
> /* Little known secret, WILMA can also fool around with BARNEY and can
> create new events with BARNEY as well as with FRED */
> 
>   (apologies to Thomas Gleixner and his renaming to "fred")
> 
> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <flintstone@goodmis.org>


Acked-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>


      reply	other threads:[~2009-12-02 20:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-12-01 17:18 [PATCH v2] tracing: add DEFINE_EVENT(), DEFINE_SINGLE_EVENT() support to docbook Jason Baron
2009-12-01 17:20 ` Randy Dunlap
2009-12-02 10:42 ` [tip:perf/core] tracing: Add " tip-bot for Jason Baron
2009-12-02 13:52   ` Steven Rostedt
2009-12-02 14:01     ` Ingo Molnar
2009-12-02 14:28       ` Steven Rostedt
2009-12-02 14:43         ` Ingo Molnar
2009-12-02 14:55           ` Steven Rostedt
2009-12-02 16:15             ` Randy Dunlap
2009-12-02 16:27             ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-12-02 17:11               ` Steven Rostedt
2009-12-02 18:06                 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-12-02 18:19                   ` Steven Rostedt
2009-12-02 19:01                     ` trace/events: DECLARE vs DEFINE semantic Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-12-02 19:19                       ` Steven Rostedt
2009-12-02 19:34                         ` Randy Dunlap
2009-12-02 22:36                         ` Masami Hiramatsu
2009-12-02 22:46                           ` Steven Rostedt
2009-12-02 22:57                             ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-12-02 23:08                               ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-12-02 23:13                                 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-12-02 23:18                                   ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-12-02 23:15                                 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-12-03  3:24                                   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2009-12-02 23:10                             ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-12-03  4:00                               ` Masami Hiramatsu
2009-12-03  4:07                                 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-12-03 13:51                                   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2009-12-03 13:54                                     ` Steven Rostedt
2009-12-03 14:09                                       ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-12-03 14:24                                         ` Steven Rostedt
2009-12-03 14:42                                           ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-12-03 15:31                                       ` Masami Hiramatsu
2009-12-03 15:56                                         ` Steven Rostedt
2009-12-03 16:11                                           ` Masami Hiramatsu
2009-12-02 20:11                       ` [PATCH][tip/perf/core] tracing: Rename TRACE_EVENT and others to something resonable Steven Rostedt
2009-12-02 20:16                         ` Frederic Weisbecker [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20091202201635.GA5141@nowhere \
    --to=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jbaron@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca \
    --cc=mhiramat@redhat.com \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=randy.dunlap@oracle.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=wcohen@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox