From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@redhat.com>,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
randy.dunlap@oracle.com, wcohen@redhat.com, fweisbec@gmail.com,
tglx@linutronix.de, jbaron@redhat.com,
linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: trace/events: DECLARE vs DEFINE semantic
Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 09:42:21 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091203144221.GA28823@Krystal> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1259850248.12870.132.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
* Steven Rostedt (rostedt@goodmis.org) wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-12-03 at 09:09 -0500, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
[...]
> > Maybe we could have separate files for:
> >
> > a) event definitions
> > b) class definitions
>
> Um, because we don't add classes nor definitions for that matter in C
> files. These files will just have:
>
> #define CREATE_TRACE_POINT
> #include <trace/event/x.h>
> #include <trace/event/y.h>
> [...]
>
>
[...]
> > I agree with Steven here: modules should come with their own trace event
> > definitions, and if the trace classes they use are not available in the
> > standard kernel, they should come with these trace classes definitions
> > too.
> >
> > A small *_trace.c file linked along with the module looks fine by me.
> >
> > And please, try to re-used the already existing symbol dependency
> > management already present in the kernel to deal with module dependency
> > on class and dependency such as:
> >
> > module-a.ko
> > defines trace class
> > module-b.ko
> > module-c.ko
> >
> > module-b and module-c define events which depend on the trace class.
> >
> > If you make the event definition depend on a symbol defined in module-a,
> > everything should work flawlessly. It also works if the class is defined
> > in the core kernel.
>
> I think the issue is where to find the headers.
>
> But this does bring up another point. I don't think I designed the class
> macro to be used by events in other headers. Looking at the code, since
> all the shared functions are "static" it wont work.
>
> I guess I can modify it to be global, and also export them as GPL.
In that case maybe it would become appropriate to extract the
TRACE_CLASS() macros meant to be used by many headers into their own
include/trace/class/*.h
headers ?
And then it starts to make sense to have separate C files for event and
class definitions.
Mathieu
--
Mathieu Desnoyers
OpenPGP key fingerprint: 8CD5 52C3 8E3C 4140 715F BA06 3F25 A8FE 3BAE 9A68
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-12-03 14:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-12-01 17:18 [PATCH v2] tracing: add DEFINE_EVENT(), DEFINE_SINGLE_EVENT() support to docbook Jason Baron
2009-12-01 17:20 ` Randy Dunlap
2009-12-02 10:42 ` [tip:perf/core] tracing: Add " tip-bot for Jason Baron
2009-12-02 13:52 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-12-02 14:01 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-12-02 14:28 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-12-02 14:43 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-12-02 14:55 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-12-02 16:15 ` Randy Dunlap
2009-12-02 16:27 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-12-02 17:11 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-12-02 18:06 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-12-02 18:19 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-12-02 19:01 ` trace/events: DECLARE vs DEFINE semantic Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-12-02 19:19 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-12-02 19:34 ` Randy Dunlap
2009-12-02 22:36 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2009-12-02 22:46 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-12-02 22:57 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-12-02 23:08 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-12-02 23:13 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-12-02 23:18 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-12-02 23:15 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-12-03 3:24 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2009-12-02 23:10 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-12-03 4:00 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2009-12-03 4:07 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-12-03 13:51 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2009-12-03 13:54 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-12-03 14:09 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-12-03 14:24 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-12-03 14:42 ` Mathieu Desnoyers [this message]
2009-12-03 15:31 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2009-12-03 15:56 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-12-03 16:11 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2009-12-02 20:11 ` [PATCH][tip/perf/core] tracing: Rename TRACE_EVENT and others to something resonable Steven Rostedt
2009-12-02 20:16 ` Frederic Weisbecker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091203144221.GA28823@Krystal \
--to=mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jbaron@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mhiramat@redhat.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=randy.dunlap@oracle.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=wcohen@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox