Re: [RFC][PATCH] sched: fix GENTLE_FAIR_SLEEPERS dependency

[Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>]

* Suresh Jayaraman <sjayaraman@suse.de> wrote:

> The newly introduced GENTLE_FAIR_SLEEPERS does not seem to have any
> effect without FAIR_SLEEPERS. Fix sysctl.sched_features to reflect
> this. Without this change, a user who sets GENTLE_FAIR_SLEEPERS
> without FAIR_SLEEPERS would assume gentle sleeper fairness which
> is not guaranteed.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Suresh Jayaraman <sjayaraman@suse.de>
> ---
> 
> Index: linux-2.6/kernel/sched.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/sched.c
> +++ linux-2.6/kernel/sched.c
> @@ -761,10 +761,22 @@ sched_feat_write(struct file *filp, cons
>  		int len = strlen(sched_feat_names[i]);
>  
>  		if (strncmp(cmp, sched_feat_names[i], len) == 0) {
> -			if (neg)
> +			if (neg) {
>  				sysctl_sched_features &= ~(1UL << i);
> -			else
> +				/*
> +				 * GENTLE_FAIR_SLEEPERS have no effect without
> +				 * FAIR_SLEEPERS.
> +				 */
> +				if (strncmp(cmp, "FAIR_SLEEPERS",
> +					    strlen("FAIR_SLEEPERS")) == 0)
> +					sysctl_sched_features &= ~(1UL << i+1);
> +			} else {
>  				sysctl_sched_features |= (1UL << i);
> +				if (strncmp(cmp, "GENTLE_FAIR_SLEEPERS",
> +					    strlen("GENTLE_FAIR_SLEEPERS"))
> +						== 0)
> +					sysctl_sched_features |= (1UL << i-1);
> +			}
>  			break;
>  		}
>  	}

There's a lot of other dependencies between scheduler features so it's 
possible to change it without it having an effect on the scheduler. 

sched_features is really a development/debugging facility, you have to 
know what you are doing.

Might be worth adding a comment to the feature definition place itself 
in the source - explain what it does and how it makes sense (and how it 
doesnt).

	Ingo