From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>,
"K. Prasad" <prasad@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] perf/hw-breakpoints: Various updates
Date: Sun, 6 Dec 2009 08:58:25 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091206075825.GA7169@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1260084898-11686-1-git-send-regression-fweisbec@gmail.com>
* Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> wrote:
> Ingo,
>
> Please pull the perf/core branch that can be found at:
>
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/frederic/random-tracing.git
> perf/core
>
> I have hesitations about the 2 last patches as they should probably
> go into another branch. Their scope is wider than perf as they also
> fix x86-64 stacktraces in general.
Pulled, thanks a lot Frederic! These are some very nice fixes - and the
call-graph frame linking fixes will improve regular stacktraces as well.
> Tell me if you'd prefer them in a separate tree based on something
> else.
perf/core is fine. Since Linus pulled them upstream earlier today these
bits will end up in perf/urgent, please base future tress on that topic
tree.
Thanks,
Ingo
prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-12-06 7:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-12-06 7:34 [GIT PULL] perf/hw-breakpoints: Various updates Frederic Weisbecker
2009-12-06 7:34 ` [PATCH 1/9] hw-breakpoints: Add two reserved fields for future extensions Frederic Weisbecker
2009-12-06 7:34 ` [PATCH 2/9] perf: Remove pointless union that wraps the hw breakpoint fields Frederic Weisbecker
2009-12-06 10:38 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-07 1:46 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-12-06 7:34 ` [PATCH 3/9] perf: Remove unused struct perf_event::event_callback Frederic Weisbecker
2009-12-06 7:34 ` [PATCH 4/9] hw-breakpoints: Drop callback and task parameters from modify helper Frederic Weisbecker
2009-12-06 7:34 ` [PATCH 5/9] hw-breakpoints: Use overflow handler instead of the event callback Frederic Weisbecker
2009-12-06 7:34 ` [PATCH 6/9] perf: Remove the "event" callback from perf events Frederic Weisbecker
2009-12-06 10:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-06 7:34 ` [PATCH 7/9] x86/perf: Exclude the debug stack from the callchains Frederic Weisbecker
2009-12-06 7:34 ` [PATCH 8/9] x86: Fixup wrong debug exception frame link in stacktraces Frederic Weisbecker
2009-12-06 7:34 ` [PATCH 9/9] x86: Fixup wrong irq " Frederic Weisbecker
2009-12-06 7:58 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091206075825.GA7169@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=acme@redhat.com \
--cc=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=prasad@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox