From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759209AbZLGJGe (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Dec 2009 04:06:34 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1757674AbZLGJGd (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Dec 2009 04:06:33 -0500 Received: from one.firstfloor.org ([213.235.205.2]:40490 "EHLO one.firstfloor.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757982AbZLGJGb (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Dec 2009 04:06:31 -0500 Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2009 10:06:34 +0100 From: Andi Kleen To: Jan Beulich Cc: Andi Kleen , akpm@linux-foundation.org, x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] [3/3] Fix unwind annotations for 64bit kernel Message-ID: <20091207090634.GC18989@one.firstfloor.org> References: <20091206313.812075626@firstfloor.org> <20091206141311.CE0A0B151F@basil.firstfloor.org> <4B1CC28F0200007800024075@vpn.id2.novell.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4B1CC28F0200007800024075@vpn.id2.novell.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > So do we, but the initial submission was rejected due to doing too many > things at once. I didn't since find time (admittedly also because not > giving it priority) to split the patch. Thanks for giving it another try! I'm not sure what should be split, it's all related and straight forward. -Andi -- ak@linux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.