From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, scameron@beardog.cce.hp.com,
James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com, achiang@hp.com,
jens.axboe@oracle.com, mikem@beardog.cce.hp.com
Subject: Re: + hpsa-use-msleep-instead-of-schedule_timeout.patch added to -mm tree
Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 14:44:19 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091208144419.af6298ba.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4B1ED241.4090803@gmail.com>
On Tue, 08 Dec 2009 23:25:05 +0100
Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 12/08/2009 11:04 PM, akpm@linux-foundation.org wrote:
> > Subject: hpsa: use msleep() instead of schedule_timeout
> > From: Stephen M. Cameron <scameron@beardog.cce.hp.com>
> >
> > Use msleep() instead of schedule_timeout
>
> The patch does more than that and moreover in a wrong manner, see below.
>
> > @@ -3262,8 +3262,8 @@ static int hpsa_pci_init(struct ctlr_inf
> > if (!(readl(h->vaddr + SA5_DOORBELL) & CFGTBL_ChangeReq))
> > break;
> > /* delay and try again */
> > - set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
> > - schedule_timeout(10);
> > + set_current_state(TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
> > + msleep(10);
>
> Why do you change interruptible sleep to uninterruptible?
Stealth bugfix ;)
If the calling process (called "modprobe") has signal_pending()
(someone ^C'ed it) then the TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE sleep will be a no-op
and the driver will probably go and screw things up.
> And you
> intermix jiffies with msecs. Use schedule_timeout_interruptible(10).
>
> > @@ -3302,7 +3302,8 @@ static int __devinit hpsa_init_one(struc
> >
> > /* Some devices (notably the HP Smart Array 5i Controller)
> > need a little pause here */
> > - schedule_timeout_uninterruptible(HPSA_POST_RESET_PAUSE);
> > + set_current_state(TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
> > + msleep(HPSA_POST_RESET_PAUSE_MSECS);
>
> Hmm, setting the state is superfluous, as msleep does the job itself.
yup, I fixed those.
> > diff -puN drivers/scsi/hpsa.h~hpsa-use-msleep-instead-of-schedule_timeout drivers/scsi/hpsa.h
> > --- a/drivers/scsi/hpsa.h~hpsa-use-msleep-instead-of-schedule_timeout
> > +++ a/drivers/scsi/hpsa.h
> ...
> > @@ -139,7 +139,7 @@ struct ctlr_info {
> > #define HPSA_BOARD_READY_ITERATIONS \
> > ((HPSA_BOARD_READY_WAIT_SECS * 1000) / \
> > HPSA_BOARD_READY_POLL_INTERVAL_MSECS)
> > -#define HPSA_POST_RESET_PAUSE (30 * HZ)
> > +#define HPSA_POST_RESET_PAUSE_MSECS (3000)
>
> Ehm?
30 seconds would have sucked anyway ;)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-12-08 22:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <200912082204.nB8M48oL027313@imap1.linux-foundation.org>
2009-12-08 22:25 ` + hpsa-use-msleep-instead-of-schedule_timeout.patch added to -mm tree Jiri Slaby
2009-12-08 22:26 ` Jiri Slaby
2009-12-08 22:43 ` scameron
2009-12-08 22:44 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2009-12-09 9:51 ` Jiri Slaby
2009-12-09 15:37 ` scameron
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091208144419.af6298ba.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
--cc=achiang@hp.com \
--cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
--cc=jirislaby@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mikem@beardog.cce.hp.com \
--cc=scameron@beardog.cce.hp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox