* RE: SR-IOV enabling process failed in kernel 2.6.32
@ 2009-12-08 9:07 Erez Shitrit
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Erez Shitrit @ 2009-12-08 9:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gregkh; +Cc: linux-kernel, linux-pci, Erez Shitrit
Hi Greg,
We are working on InfiniBand device that supports SR-IOV.
and lately (from version 2.6.32 ) we faced a problem:
When the driver tried to enable SR-IOV it failed to allocate resources
for the 2 BARS the device needs.
The situation is when there are 2 BARS, the first asks for little amount
of memory and the second asks for much larger memory requirements.
I saw in the code (drivers/pci/iov.c) that the order of the allocation
starts from the first BAR to the last.
The code:
for (i = 0; i < PCI_SRIOV_NUM_BARS; i++) {
res = iov->res + i;
if (!res->flags)
continue;
rc = pci_assign_resource(dev, i + PCI_IOV_RESOURCES);
This process failed for the second BAR (The big one). (in the log: "not
enough MMIO resources for SR-IOV")
I think (IMHO) it because the allocation of the first BAR (the little)
one was from the allocated slot of the big one (the allocation from the
sriov_init function)
and when the kernel tries to allocate the slot for he second BAR (the
big one) in the place of the little one it failed.
when I changed the code to start the allocation from the last to the
first: for (i = PCI_SRIOV_NUM_BARS; i >= 0; i--)
It works fine.
Is it a bug ?
Thanks, Erez
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: SR-IOV enabling process failed in kernel 2.6.32
[not found] <2ED289D4E09FBD4D92D911E869B97FDD01E6E538@mtlexch01.mtl.com>
@ 2009-12-08 17:34 ` Greg KH
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Greg KH @ 2009-12-08 17:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Erez Shitrit; +Cc: linux-kernel, linux-pci
On Tue, Dec 08, 2009 at 11:02:22AM +0200, Erez Shitrit wrote:
> Hi Greg,
>
> We are working on InfiniBand device that supports SR-IOV.
> and lately (from version 2.6.32 ) we faced a problem:
> When the driver tried to enable SR-IOV it failed to allocate resources
> for the 2 BARS the device needs.
Hm, you do realize I'm no longer the PCI maintainer, and havn't been for
about 1 1/2 years, right? :)
> The situation is when there are 2 BARS, the first asks for little amount
> of memory and the second asks for much larger memory requirements.
> I saw in the code (drivers/pci/iov.c) that the order of the allocation
> starts from the first BAR to the last
> The code:
> for (i = 0; i < PCI_SRIOV_NUM_BARS; i++) {
> res = iov->res + i;
> if (!res->flags)
> continue;
> rc = pci_assign_resource(dev, i + PCI_IOV_RESOURCES);
>
> This process failed for the second BAR (The big one). (in the log: "not
> enough MMIO resources for SR-IOV")
>
> I think (IMHO) it because the allocation of the first BAR (the little)
> one was from the allocated slot of the big one (the allocation from the
> sriov_init function)
> and when the kernel tries to allocate the slot for he second BAR (the
> big one) in the place of the little one it failed.
>
> when I changed the code to start the allocation from the last to the
> first: for (i = PCI_SRIOV_NUM_BARS; i >= 0; i--)
> It works fine.
>
> Is it a bug ?
I don't know, care to make a patch that shows your exact change?
thanks,
greg k-h
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-12-08 17:37 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <2ED289D4E09FBD4D92D911E869B97FDD01E6E538@mtlexch01.mtl.com>
2009-12-08 17:34 ` SR-IOV enabling process failed in kernel 2.6.32 Greg KH
2009-12-08 9:07 Erez Shitrit
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox