[90/90] ext4: Fix potential fiemap deadlock (mmap_sem vs. i_data_sem)

[Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>]

[-- Attachment #1: ext4-fix-potential-fiemap-deadlock-mmap_sem-vs.-i_data_sem.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 5129 bytes --]

2.6.31-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let us know.

------------------
(cherry picked from commit fab3a549e204172236779f502eccb4f9bf0dc87d)

Fix the following potential circular locking dependency between
mm->mmap_sem and ei->i_data_sem:

    =======================================================
    [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
    2.6.32-04115-gec044c5 #37
    -------------------------------------------------------
    ureadahead/1855 is trying to acquire lock:
     (&mm->mmap_sem){++++++}, at: [<ffffffff81107224>] might_fault+0x5c/0xac

    but task is already holding lock:
     (&ei->i_data_sem){++++..}, at: [<ffffffff811be1fd>] ext4_fiemap+0x11b/0x159

    which lock already depends on the new lock.

    the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

    -> #1 (&ei->i_data_sem){++++..}:
           [<ffffffff81099bfa>] __lock_acquire+0xb67/0xd0f
           [<ffffffff81099e7e>] lock_acquire+0xdc/0x102
           [<ffffffff81516633>] down_read+0x51/0x84
           [<ffffffff811a2414>] ext4_get_blocks+0x50/0x2a5
           [<ffffffff811a3453>] ext4_get_block+0xab/0xef
           [<ffffffff81154f39>] do_mpage_readpage+0x198/0x48d
           [<ffffffff81155360>] mpage_readpages+0xd0/0x114
           [<ffffffff811a104b>] ext4_readpages+0x1d/0x1f
           [<ffffffff810f8644>] __do_page_cache_readahead+0x12f/0x1bc
           [<ffffffff810f86f2>] ra_submit+0x21/0x25
           [<ffffffff810f0cfd>] filemap_fault+0x19f/0x32c
           [<ffffffff81107b97>] __do_fault+0x55/0x3a2
           [<ffffffff81109db0>] handle_mm_fault+0x327/0x734
           [<ffffffff8151aaa9>] do_page_fault+0x292/0x2aa
           [<ffffffff81518205>] page_fault+0x25/0x30
           [<ffffffff812a34d8>] clear_user+0x38/0x3c
           [<ffffffff81167e16>] padzero+0x20/0x31
           [<ffffffff81168b47>] load_elf_binary+0x8bc/0x17ed
           [<ffffffff81130e95>] search_binary_handler+0xc2/0x259
           [<ffffffff81166d64>] load_script+0x1b8/0x1cc
           [<ffffffff81130e95>] search_binary_handler+0xc2/0x259
           [<ffffffff8113255f>] do_execve+0x1ce/0x2cf
           [<ffffffff81027494>] sys_execve+0x43/0x5a
           [<ffffffff8102918a>] stub_execve+0x6a/0xc0

    -> #0 (&mm->mmap_sem){++++++}:
           [<ffffffff81099aa4>] __lock_acquire+0xa11/0xd0f
           [<ffffffff81099e7e>] lock_acquire+0xdc/0x102
           [<ffffffff81107251>] might_fault+0x89/0xac
           [<ffffffff81139382>] fiemap_fill_next_extent+0x95/0xda
           [<ffffffff811bcb43>] ext4_ext_fiemap_cb+0x138/0x157
           [<ffffffff811be069>] ext4_ext_walk_space+0x178/0x1f1
           [<ffffffff811be21e>] ext4_fiemap+0x13c/0x159
           [<ffffffff811390e6>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x348/0x4d6
           [<ffffffff811392ca>] sys_ioctl+0x56/0x79
           [<ffffffff81028cb2>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b

    other info that might help us debug this:

    1 lock held by ureadahead/1855:
     #0:  (&ei->i_data_sem){++++..}, at: [<ffffffff811be1fd>] ext4_fiemap+0x11b/0x159

    stack backtrace:
    Pid: 1855, comm: ureadahead Not tainted 2.6.32-04115-gec044c5 #37
    Call Trace:
     [<ffffffff81098c70>] print_circular_bug+0xa8/0xb7
     [<ffffffff81099aa4>] __lock_acquire+0xa11/0xd0f
     [<ffffffff8102f229>] ? sched_clock+0x9/0xd
     [<ffffffff81099e7e>] lock_acquire+0xdc/0x102
     [<ffffffff81107224>] ? might_fault+0x5c/0xac
     [<ffffffff81107251>] might_fault+0x89/0xac
     [<ffffffff81107224>] ? might_fault+0x5c/0xac
     [<ffffffff81124b44>] ? __kmalloc+0x13b/0x18c
     [<ffffffff81139382>] fiemap_fill_next_extent+0x95/0xda
     [<ffffffff811bcb43>] ext4_ext_fiemap_cb+0x138/0x157
     [<ffffffff811bca0b>] ? ext4_ext_fiemap_cb+0x0/0x157
     [<ffffffff811be069>] ext4_ext_walk_space+0x178/0x1f1
     [<ffffffff811be21e>] ext4_fiemap+0x13c/0x159
     [<ffffffff81107224>] ? might_fault+0x5c/0xac
     [<ffffffff811390e6>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x348/0x4d6
     [<ffffffff8129f6d0>] ? __up_read+0x8d/0x95
     [<ffffffff81517fb5>] ? retint_swapgs+0x13/0x1b
     [<ffffffff811392ca>] sys_ioctl+0x56/0x79
     [<ffffffff81028cb2>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b

Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
---
 fs/ext4/extents.c |    4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/fs/ext4/extents.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/extents.c
@@ -1742,7 +1742,9 @@ int ext4_ext_walk_space(struct inode *in
 	while (block < last && block != EXT_MAX_BLOCK) {
 		num = last - block;
 		/* find extent for this block */
+		down_read(&EXT4_I(inode)->i_data_sem);
 		path = ext4_ext_find_extent(inode, block, path);
+		up_read(&EXT4_I(inode)->i_data_sem);
 		if (IS_ERR(path)) {
 			err = PTR_ERR(path);
 			path = NULL;
@@ -3707,10 +3709,8 @@ int ext4_fiemap(struct inode *inode, str
 		 * Walk the extent tree gathering extent information.
 		 * ext4_ext_fiemap_cb will push extents back to user.
 		 */
-		down_read(&EXT4_I(inode)->i_data_sem);
 		error = ext4_ext_walk_space(inode, start_blk, len_blks,
 					  ext4_ext_fiemap_cb, fieinfo);
-		up_read(&EXT4_I(inode)->i_data_sem);
 	}
 
 	return error;