From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752959AbZLKM1b (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Dec 2009 07:27:31 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751952AbZLKM1Z (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Dec 2009 07:27:25 -0500 Received: from mail-ew0-f209.google.com ([209.85.219.209]:39641 "EHLO mail-ew0-f209.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751932AbZLKM1Z (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Dec 2009 07:27:25 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding :in-reply-to:user-agent; b=pEJakeLHq1/lj4WfJmJp9cW7B61VQPvURK23fZ6GTNZ4gmQWbq9HmB3ri3jR8th1aC TnvL+cUtRssloVz/LLEShkV/S9JQ+vXN/oBRAVWwca/ykcdlXHBFjiLq+J6iNp36LFYe nO7ADafeDgf4F2GwPKZP4Ac91buG3wzEFWYHY= Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 13:27:23 +0100 From: Frederic Weisbecker To: Frederic Riss Cc: Li Zefan , Steven Rostedt , Ingo Molnar , Wenji Huang , LKML Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] ftrace: Fix MATCH_END_ONLY filter matching Message-ID: <20091211122721.GH5244@nowhere> References: <4B2217D0.5000308@cn.fujitsu.com> <87d3b2040912110420w270cff7ew36a7f2389a88fdb9@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <87d3b2040912110420w270cff7ew36a7f2389a88fdb9@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 01:20:04PM +0100, Frederic Riss wrote: > 2009/12/11 Li Zefan : > > For '*foo' pattern, we should allow any string ending with > > 'foo', but ftrace filter incorrectly disallows strings > > like bar_foo_foo: > [...] > >        case MATCH_END_ONLY: > > -               ptr = strstr(str, regex); > > -               if (ptr && (ptr[len] == 0)) > > +               slen = strlen(str); > > +               if (slen >= len && memcpy(str + slen - len, regex, len)) > >                        matched = 1; > > Shouldn't that be memcmp() == 0? I don't see how memcpy might serve as > a compare operator. > > Fred. Oh you're right, I reviewed it too quickly. Perhaps the star's alignment made it possible for only one Frederic to review it the right way...