From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] [PATCH 2/2] tracing: Add stack trace to irqsoff tracer
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 13:40:20 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091211184213.138039608@goodmis.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20091211184018.738768739@goodmis.org
[-- Attachment #1: 0002-tracing-Add-stack-trace-to-irqsoff-tracer.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 3010 bytes --]
From: Steven Rostedt <srostedt@redhat.com>
The irqsoff and friends tracers help in finding causes of latency in the
kernel. The also work with the function tracer to show what was happening
when interrupts or preemption are disabled. But the function tracer has
a bit of an overhead and can cause exagerated readings.
Currently, when tracing with /proc/sys/kernel/ftrace_enabled = 0, where the
function tracer is disabled, the information that is provided can end up
being useless. For example, a 2 and a half millisecond latency only showed:
# tracer: preemptirqsoff
#
# preemptirqsoff latency trace v1.1.5 on 2.6.32
# --------------------------------------------------------------------
# latency: 2463 us, #4/4, CPU#2 | (M:preempt VP:0, KP:0, SP:0 HP:0 #P:4)
# -----------------
# | task: -4242 (uid:0 nice:0 policy:0 rt_prio:0)
# -----------------
# => started at: _spin_lock_irqsave
# => ended at: remove_wait_queue
#
#
# _------=> CPU#
# / _-----=> irqs-off
# | / _----=> need-resched
# || / _---=> hardirq/softirq
# ||| / _--=> preempt-depth
# |||| /_--=> lock-depth
# |||||/ delay
# cmd pid |||||| time | caller
# \ / |||||| \ | /
hackbenc-4242 2d.... 0us!: trace_hardirqs_off <-_spin_lock_irqsave
hackbenc-4242 2...1. 2463us+: _spin_unlock_irqrestore <-remove_wait_queue
hackbenc-4242 2...1. 2466us : trace_preempt_on <-remove_wait_queue
The above lets us know that hackbench with pid 2463 grabbed a spin lock
somewhere and enabled preemption at remove_wait_queue. This helps a little
but where this actually happened is not informative.
This patch adds the stack dump to the end of the irqsoff tracer. This provides
the following output:
hackbenc-4242 2d.... 0us!: trace_hardirqs_off <-_spin_lock_irqsave
hackbenc-4242 2...1. 2463us+: _spin_unlock_irqrestore <-remove_wait_queue
hackbenc-4242 2...1. 2466us : trace_preempt_on <-remove_wait_queue
hackbenc-4242 2...1. 2467us : <stack trace>
=> sub_preempt_count
=> _spin_unlock_irqrestore
=> remove_wait_queue
=> free_poll_entry
=> poll_freewait
=> do_sys_poll
=> sys_poll
=> system_call_fastpath
Now we see that the culprit of this latency was the free_poll_entry code.
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
---
kernel/trace/trace_irqsoff.c | 2 ++
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_irqsoff.c b/kernel/trace/trace_irqsoff.c
index 3aa7eaa..2974bc7 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/trace_irqsoff.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace_irqsoff.c
@@ -151,6 +151,8 @@ check_critical_timing(struct trace_array *tr,
goto out_unlock;
trace_function(tr, CALLER_ADDR0, parent_ip, flags, pc);
+ /* Skip 5 functions to get to the irq/preempt enable function */
+ __trace_stack(tr, flags, 5, pc);
if (data->critical_sequence != max_sequence)
goto out_unlock;
--
1.6.5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-12-11 18:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-12-11 18:40 [PATCH 0/2] [GIT PULL] tracing: stack tracing Steven Rostedt
2009-12-11 18:40 ` [PATCH 1/2] [PATCH 1/2] tracing: Add trace_dump_stack() Steven Rostedt
2009-12-11 18:40 ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2009-12-14 16:12 ` [PATCH 0/2] [GIT PULL] tracing: stack tracing Ingo Molnar
2009-12-14 16:27 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-12-14 16:46 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-12-14 21:44 ` [PATCH][GIT PULL] tracing: Fix return of trace_dump_stack() Steven Rostedt
2009-12-15 7:34 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-12-15 8:09 ` [tip:tracing/urgent] " tip-bot for Steven Rostedt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091211184213.138039608@goodmis.org \
--to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox