Re: kexec boot regression

Jens Axboe
2009-12-15T19:51:18Z

On Tue, Dec 15 2009, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> Jens Axboe wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 15 2009, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> >> [PATCH] x86/pci: intel ioh bus num reg accessing fix
> >>
> >> it is above 0x100, so if mmconf is not enable, need to skip it
> >
> > This works, it kexecs kernels fine. But since 2.6.32 doesn't have the
> > mmconf problem to begin with, are we now just working around the issue?
> > SRAT still reports issues, numa doesn't work.
>
> that patch will be bullet proof... we need it.
>
> also still need to figure out why memmap range is not passed properly.
>
> do you mean 2.6.32 kexec 2.6.32 it have worked mmconf and numa in
> second kernel?

Yes, 2.6.32 booted and 2.6.32 kexec'ed works just fine, no SRAT
complaints and NUMA works fine.

--
Jens Axboe