Re: kexec boot regression

Yinghai Lu
2009-12-15T19:49:42Z

Jens Axboe wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 15 2009, Yinghai Lu wrote:
>> [PATCH] x86/pci: intel ioh bus num reg accessing fix
>>
>> it is above 0x100, so if mmconf is not enable, need to skip it
>
> This works, it kexecs kernels fine. But since 2.6.32 doesn't have the
> mmconf problem to begin with, are we now just working around the issue?
> SRAT still reports issues, numa doesn't work.

that patch will be bullet proof... we need it.

also still need to figure out why memmap range is not passed properly.

do you mean 2.6.32 kexec 2.6.32 it have worked mmconf and numa in second kernel?

YH