Re: kexec boot regression

Yinghai Lu
2009-12-15T20:16:11Z

Jens Axboe wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 15 2009, Yinghai Lu wrote:
>> Jens Axboe wrote:
>>> On Tue, Dec 15 2009, Yinghai Lu wrote:
>>>> [PATCH] x86/pci: intel ioh bus num reg accessing fix
>>>>
>>>> it is above 0x100, so if mmconf is not enable, need to skip it
>>> This works, it kexecs kernels fine. But since 2.6.32 doesn't have the
>>> mmconf problem to begin with, are we now just working around the issue?
>>> SRAT still reports issues, numa doesn't work.
>> that patch will be bullet proof... we need it.
>>
>> also still need to figure out why memmap range is not passed properly.
>>
>> do you mean 2.6.32 kexec 2.6.32 it have worked mmconf and numa in
>> second kernel?
>
> Yes, 2.6.32 booted and 2.6.32 kexec'ed works just fine, no SRAT
> complaints and NUMA works fine.

do you need
memmap=62G@4G
in this case?

YH