From: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
To: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: register_timer_hook use in arch/sh/oprofile
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 13:52:45 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091216045245.GC31265@linux-sh.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090624145406.7f0f579b@skybase>
Hi Martin,
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 02:54:06PM +0200, Martin Schwidefsky wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Jun 2009 21:34:16 +0900
> Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org> wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 02:28:28PM +0200, Martin Schwidefsky wrote:
> > > On Wed, 24 Jun 2009 20:29:29 +0900
> > > Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org> wrote:
> > > > No. oprofile_timer_init() is only entered if the performance counters
> > > > fail to register in the SH7750 case, so there is only one timer hook user
> > > > at a time:
> > > >
> > > > static int __init oprofile_init(void)
> > > > {
> > > > int err;
> > > >
> > > > err = oprofile_arch_init(&oprofile_ops);
> > > >
> > > > if (err < 0 || timer) {
> > > > printk(KERN_INFO "oprofile: using timer interrupt.\n");
> > > > oprofile_timer_init(&oprofile_ops);
> > > > }
> > > > ...
> > >
> > > Oh, I see. That is the reason why the s390 version of
> > > oprofile_arch_init returns -ENODEV. It does so to trigger the fallback
> > > to the timer_hook. That should work for sh as well, no?
> > >
> > It would, yes, but it would also disable access to the SH7750 counters at
> > the same time, so we don't really want to do that. The sh7750 counters
> > are more like timer based profiling with some extra events that can be
> > set and read, so reverting to oprofile_timer_init() would reduce
> > functionality.
> >
> > My current plan is to migrate things over to the perf_counter API and
> > annoy Ingo with my interrupt deprived counters ;-)
> >
> > Given that hrtimers are already generically supported there, it should
> > tie in much cleaner there than in the oprofile case at least.
>
> Ok, that makes sense. So I guess for now I should stop trying to get
> rid of the timer_hook and concentrate to convert the fallback code
> in timer_int.c to hrtimer. Then after sh is fully converted to the
> perf_counter API we can do the cleanup.
>
This is just a follow-up to let you know that the first-step transition
to the perf_counter API is done. There's still more work to do, but we're
already more functional on the perf_counter side than we ever were on
oprofile. As such, I've subsequently killed off the bitrotted oprofile
bits, which includes the timer hook references.
There is now nothing remaining on the SH side blocking the timer hook
removal.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-12-16 4:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-24 11:11 register_timer_hook use in arch/sh/oprofile Martin Schwidefsky
2009-06-24 11:29 ` Paul Mundt
2009-06-24 12:17 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-24 12:25 ` Paul Mundt
2009-06-24 12:37 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-24 12:40 ` Paul Mackerras
2009-06-24 12:47 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-24 12:28 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2009-06-24 12:34 ` Paul Mundt
2009-06-24 12:45 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-24 13:14 ` Paul Mundt
2009-06-24 13:24 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-26 7:01 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-06-26 7:23 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-26 7:26 ` Paul Mundt
2009-06-26 7:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-06-24 12:54 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2009-12-16 4:52 ` Paul Mundt [this message]
2009-12-16 7:21 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091216045245.GC31265@linux-sh.org \
--to=lethal@linux-sh.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox