From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Subject: [PATCH 06/12] sched: Ensure set_task_cpu() is never called on blocked tasks
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 18:04:36 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091216170517.807938893@chello.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20091216170430.073353839@chello.nl
[-- Attachment #1: foo4.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 5156 bytes --]
In order to clean up the set_task_cpu() rq dependencies we need to
ensure it is never called on blocked tasks because such usage does not
pair with consistent rq->lock usage.
This puts the migration burden on ttwu().
Furthermore we need to close a race against changing ->cpus_allowed,
since select_task_rq() runs with only preemption disabled.
For sched_fork() this is safe because the child isn't in the tasklist
yet, for wakeup we fix this by synchronizing set_cpus_allowed_ptr()
against TASK_WAKING, which leaves sched_exec to be a problem
This also closes a hole in (6ad4c1888 sched: Fix balance vs hotplug
race) where ->select_task_rq() doesn't validate the result against the
sched_domain/root_domain.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
---
kernel/sched.c | 85 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
1 file changed, 66 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
Index: linux-2.6/kernel/sched.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/sched.c
+++ linux-2.6/kernel/sched.c
@@ -2018,22 +2018,15 @@ static inline void check_class_changed(s
*/
void kthread_bind(struct task_struct *p, unsigned int cpu)
{
- struct rq *rq = cpu_rq(cpu);
- unsigned long flags;
-
/* Must have done schedule() in kthread() before we set_task_cpu */
if (!wait_task_inactive(p, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE)) {
WARN_ON(1);
return;
}
- raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&rq->lock, flags);
- update_rq_clock(rq);
- set_task_cpu(p, cpu);
p->cpus_allowed = cpumask_of_cpu(cpu);
p->rt.nr_cpus_allowed = 1;
p->flags |= PF_THREAD_BOUND;
- raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rq->lock, flags);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(kthread_bind);
@@ -2074,6 +2067,14 @@ void set_task_cpu(struct task_struct *p,
struct cfs_rq *old_cfsrq = task_cfs_rq(p),
*new_cfsrq = cpu_cfs_rq(old_cfsrq, new_cpu);
+#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_DEBUG
+ /*
+ * We should never call set_task_cpu() on a blocked task,
+ * ttwu() will sort out the placement.
+ */
+ WARN_ON(p->state != TASK_RUNNING && p->state != TASK_WAKING);
+#endif
+
trace_sched_migrate_task(p, new_cpu);
if (old_cpu != new_cpu) {
@@ -2107,13 +2108,10 @@ migrate_task(struct task_struct *p, int
/*
* If the task is not on a runqueue (and not running), then
- * it is sufficient to simply update the task's cpu field.
+ * the next wake-up will properly place the task.
*/
- if (!p->se.on_rq && !task_running(rq, p)) {
- update_rq_clock(rq);
- set_task_cpu(p, dest_cpu);
+ if (!p->se.on_rq && !task_running(rq, p))
return 0;
- }
init_completion(&req->done);
req->task = p;
@@ -2319,10 +2317,42 @@ void task_oncpu_function_call(struct tas
}
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
+/*
+ * Called from:
+ *
+ * - fork, @p is stable because it isn't on the tasklist yet
+ *
+ * - exec, @p is unstable XXX
+ *
+ * - wake-up, we serialize ->cpus_allowed against TASK_WAKING so
+ * we should be good.
+ */
static inline
int select_task_rq(struct task_struct *p, int sd_flags, int wake_flags)
{
- return p->sched_class->select_task_rq(p, sd_flags, wake_flags);
+ int cpu = p->sched_class->select_task_rq(p, sd_flags, wake_flags);
+
+ /*
+ * In order not to call set_task_cpu() on a blocking task we need
+ * to rely on ttwu() to place the task on a valid ->cpus_allowed
+ * cpu.
+ *
+ * Since this is common to all placement strategies, this lives here.
+ *
+ * [ this allows ->select_task() to simply return task_cpu(p) and
+ * not worry about this generic constraint ]
+ */
+ if (unlikely(!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, &p->cpus_allowed) ||
+ !cpu_active(cpu))) {
+
+ cpu = cpumask_any_and(&p->cpus_allowed, cpu_active_mask);
+ /*
+ * XXX: race against hot-plug modifying cpu_active_mask
+ */
+ BUG_ON(cpu >= nr_cpu_ids);
+ }
+
+ return cpu;
}
#endif
@@ -7102,7 +7132,23 @@ int set_cpus_allowed_ptr(struct task_str
struct rq *rq;
int ret = 0;
+ /*
+ * Since we rely on wake-ups to migrate sleeping tasks, don't change
+ * the ->cpus_allowed mask from under waking tasks, which would be
+ * possible when we change rq->lock in ttwu(), so synchronize against
+ * TASK_WAKING to avoid that.
+ */
+again:
+ while (p->state == TASK_WAKING)
+ cpu_relax();
+
rq = task_rq_lock(p, &flags);
+
+ if (p->state == TASK_WAKING) {
+ task_rq_unlock(rq, &flags);
+ goto again;
+ }
+
if (!cpumask_intersects(new_mask, cpu_active_mask)) {
ret = -EINVAL;
goto out;
@@ -7158,7 +7204,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(set_cpus_allowed_ptr);
static int __migrate_task(struct task_struct *p, int src_cpu, int dest_cpu)
{
struct rq *rq_dest, *rq_src;
- int ret = 0, on_rq;
+ int ret = 0;
if (unlikely(!cpu_active(dest_cpu)))
return ret;
@@ -7174,12 +7220,13 @@ static int __migrate_task(struct task_st
if (!cpumask_test_cpu(dest_cpu, &p->cpus_allowed))
goto fail;
- on_rq = p->se.on_rq;
- if (on_rq)
+ /*
+ * If we're not on a rq, the next wake-up will ensure we're
+ * placed properly.
+ */
+ if (p->se.on_rq) {
deactivate_task(rq_src, p, 0);
-
- set_task_cpu(p, dest_cpu);
- if (on_rq) {
+ set_task_cpu(p, dest_cpu);
activate_task(rq_dest, p, 0);
check_preempt_curr(rq_dest, p, 0);
}
--
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-12-16 17:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-12-16 17:04 [PATCH 00/12] sched: cleanup set_task_cpu() issues Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-16 17:04 ` [PATCH 01/12] sched: Mark boot-cpu active before smp_init() Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-16 18:36 ` [tip:sched/urgent] " tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-16 17:04 ` [PATCH 02/12] sched: Fix set_cpu_active() in cpu_down() Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-16 17:56 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-16 18:36 ` [tip:sched/urgent] " tip-bot for Xiaotian Feng
2009-12-16 17:04 ` [PATCH 03/12] sched: Fix task_hot() test order Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-16 18:37 ` [tip:sched/urgent] " tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-16 17:04 ` [PATCH 04/12] sched: select_task_rq_fair() must honour SD_LOAD_BALANCE Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-16 18:37 ` [tip:sched/urgent] sched: Select_task_rq_fair() " tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-16 17:04 ` [PATCH 05/12] sched: Use TASK_WAKING for fork wakups Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-16 18:37 ` [tip:sched/urgent] " tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-16 17:04 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2009-12-16 18:37 ` [tip:sched/urgent] sched: Ensure set_task_cpu() is never called on blocked tasks tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-17 5:09 ` [tip:sched/urgent] sched: Make warning less noisy tip-bot for Ingo Molnar
2009-12-16 17:04 ` [PATCH 07/12] sched: Fix sched_exec() balancing Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-16 18:38 ` [tip:sched/urgent] " tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-16 17:04 ` [PATCH 08/12] sched: Fix select_task_rq() vs hotplug issues Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-16 18:38 ` [tip:sched/urgent] " tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-16 17:04 ` [PATCH 09/12] sched: Move kthread_bind() back to kthread.c Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-16 18:38 ` [tip:sched/urgent] " tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-16 17:04 ` [PATCH 10/12] sched: Add pre and post wakeup hooks Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-16 18:38 ` [tip:sched/urgent] " tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-16 17:04 ` [PATCH 11/12] sched: Remove the cfs_rq dependency from set_task_cpu() Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-16 18:39 ` [tip:sched/urgent] " tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-16 17:04 ` [PATCH 12/12] sched: Simplify set_task_cpu() Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-16 18:39 ` [tip:sched/urgent] " tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-16 21:17 ` [PATCH 13/12] sched: remove debug check Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091216170517.807938893@chello.nl \
--to=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox