From: Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>
To: Roland Dreier <rdreier@cisco.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
kexec@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: kexec reboot broken with ioatdma?
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 09:49:12 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091216224912.GC16219@verge.net.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ada3a3a8v1g.fsf@roland-alpha.cisco.com>
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 01:32:11PM -0800, Roland Dreier wrote:
> I have a system with IOAT hardware, and rebooting with kexec fails with
> the latest 2.6.32-git kernel. I haven't really tried earlier kernels,
> but I suspect the issue comes from the ioatdma driver being autoloaded now.
>
> The reboot gets stuck at:
>
> ioatdma 0000:00:16.0: Self-test copy timed out, disabling
> ioatdma 0000:00:16.0: Freeing 2 in use descriptors!
> ioatdma 0000:00:16.0: Intel(R) I/OAT DMA Engine init failed
>
> so presumably the IOAT hardware is left in a bad state that the ioatdma
> driver in the kexec'ed new kernel can't handle.
>
> I notice that long ago, there was a commit 428ed602 ("I/OAT: fix I/OAT
> for kexec") that added a shutdown method to clean things up so kexec
> worked, and then more recently there was 4fac7fa5 ("ioat: do not perform
> removal actions at shutdown") that got rid of the shutdown hook.
>
> I'm not sure what the correct fix is here: fix the shutdown order so
> everyone drops all references to IOAT stuff before IOAT is shutdown, or
> add some code to the ioatdma driver so it resets the hardware on startup
> so the new kernel can deal with an unspecified state.
Hi Roland,
from a kexec point of view I believe that the preferred option is the
former - shutdown the device so it can be initialised using standard paths
in the second kernel.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-12-16 22:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-12-16 21:32 kexec reboot broken with ioatdma? Roland Dreier
2009-12-16 22:49 ` Simon Horman [this message]
2009-12-16 23:04 ` Roland Dreier
2009-12-16 23:11 ` Dan Williams
2009-12-16 23:23 ` Roland Dreier
2009-12-18 22:10 ` Dan Williams
2009-12-18 22:20 ` Roland Dreier
2009-12-18 22:23 ` Dan Williams
2009-12-18 22:32 ` Roland Dreier
2009-12-19 7:34 ` Simon Horman
2009-12-16 23:36 ` Simon Horman
2009-12-16 23:42 ` Roland Dreier
2009-12-16 23:45 ` Simon Horman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091216224912.GC16219@verge.net.au \
--to=horms@verge.net.au \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rdreier@cisco.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox