public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>
To: Roland Dreier <rdreier@cisco.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	kexec@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: kexec reboot broken with ioatdma?
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 09:49:12 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091216224912.GC16219@verge.net.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ada3a3a8v1g.fsf@roland-alpha.cisco.com>

On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 01:32:11PM -0800, Roland Dreier wrote:
> I have a system with IOAT hardware, and rebooting with kexec fails with
> the latest 2.6.32-git kernel.  I haven't really tried earlier kernels,
> but I suspect the issue comes from the ioatdma driver being autoloaded now.
> 
> The reboot gets stuck at:
> 
>   ioatdma 0000:00:16.0: Self-test copy timed out, disabling
>   ioatdma 0000:00:16.0: Freeing 2 in use descriptors!
>   ioatdma 0000:00:16.0: Intel(R) I/OAT DMA Engine init failed
> 
> so presumably the IOAT hardware is left in a bad state that the ioatdma
> driver in the kexec'ed new kernel can't handle.
> 
> I notice that long ago, there was a commit 428ed602 ("I/OAT: fix I/OAT
> for kexec") that added a shutdown method to clean things up so kexec
> worked, and then more recently there was 4fac7fa5 ("ioat: do not perform
> removal actions at shutdown") that got rid of the shutdown hook.
> 
> I'm not sure what the correct fix is here: fix the shutdown order so
> everyone drops all references to IOAT stuff before IOAT is shutdown, or
> add some code to the ioatdma driver so it resets the hardware on startup
> so the new kernel can deal with an unspecified state.

Hi Roland,

from a kexec point of view I believe that the preferred option is the
former - shutdown the device so it can be initialised using standard paths
in the second kernel.


  reply	other threads:[~2009-12-16 22:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-12-16 21:32 kexec reboot broken with ioatdma? Roland Dreier
2009-12-16 22:49 ` Simon Horman [this message]
2009-12-16 23:04   ` Roland Dreier
2009-12-16 23:11     ` Dan Williams
2009-12-16 23:23       ` Roland Dreier
2009-12-18 22:10         ` Dan Williams
2009-12-18 22:20           ` Roland Dreier
2009-12-18 22:23             ` Dan Williams
2009-12-18 22:32               ` Roland Dreier
2009-12-19  7:34             ` Simon Horman
2009-12-16 23:36     ` Simon Horman
2009-12-16 23:42       ` Roland Dreier
2009-12-16 23:45         ` Simon Horman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20091216224912.GC16219@verge.net.au \
    --to=horms@verge.net.au \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rdreier@cisco.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox