From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932595AbZLQITV (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Dec 2009 03:19:21 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1764083AbZLQITU (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Dec 2009 03:19:20 -0500 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.210]:60444 "EHLO verein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1761139AbZLQITT (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Dec 2009 03:19:19 -0500 Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 09:19:16 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Paul Mundt Cc: Christoph Hellwig , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] sh: convert to asm-generic/hardirq.h Message-ID: <20091217081916.GA11850@lst.de> References: <20090804145529.GL20487@lst.de> <20090805071828.GA8415@linux-sh.org> <20091217081048.GB11571@lst.de> <20091217081554.GB20425@linux-sh.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20091217081554.GB20425@linux-sh.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i X-Spam-Score: 0 () Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 05:15:54PM +0900, Paul Mundt wrote: > On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 09:10:48AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 05, 2009 at 04:18:28PM +0900, Paul Mundt wrote: > > > On Tue, Aug 04, 2009 at 04:55:29PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig > > > > > > > Applied, thanks. > > > > Did this cause problems in the end? Still doesn't seem to be in Linus' > > tree. > > Nope, it was in Linus' tree for awhile, but then I needed to add an > nmi_count and had to switch back to an arch-specific one. Is there a good reason to overload the irq_cpustat with that? It seems like a quite horrible way to duplicate per-cpu data in a less efficient way.