From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Subject: [PATCH 6/6] perf: Dont report side-band events on each cpu for per-task-per-cpu events
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 13:16:32 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091217121830.215333434@chello.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20091217121626.682772324@chello.nl
[-- Attachment #1: perf4.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 3283 bytes --]
Acme noticed that his FORK/MMAP numbers were inflated by about the
same factor as his cpu-count.
This led to the discovery of a few more sites that need to respect the
event->cpu filter.
Reported-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@ghostprotocols.net>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
---
kernel/perf_event.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++--------------
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
Index: linux-2.6/kernel/perf_event.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/perf_event.c
+++ linux-2.6/kernel/perf_event.c
@@ -1381,6 +1381,9 @@ static void perf_ctx_adjust_freq(struct
if (event->state != PERF_EVENT_STATE_ACTIVE)
continue;
+ if (event->cpu != -1 && event->cpu != smp_processor_id())
+ continue;
+
hwc = &event->hw;
interrupts = hwc->interrupts;
@@ -3265,6 +3268,9 @@ static void perf_event_task_output(struc
static int perf_event_task_match(struct perf_event *event)
{
+ if (event->cpu != -1 && event->cpu != smp_processor_id())
+ return 0;
+
if (event->attr.comm || event->attr.mmap || event->attr.task)
return 1;
@@ -3290,12 +3296,11 @@ static void perf_event_task_event(struct
rcu_read_lock();
cpuctx = &get_cpu_var(perf_cpu_context);
perf_event_task_ctx(&cpuctx->ctx, task_event);
- put_cpu_var(perf_cpu_context);
-
if (!ctx)
ctx = rcu_dereference(task_event->task->perf_event_ctxp);
if (ctx)
perf_event_task_ctx(ctx, task_event);
+ put_cpu_var(perf_cpu_context);
rcu_read_unlock();
}
@@ -3372,6 +3377,9 @@ static void perf_event_comm_output(struc
static int perf_event_comm_match(struct perf_event *event)
{
+ if (event->cpu != -1 && event->cpu != smp_processor_id())
+ return 0;
+
if (event->attr.comm)
return 1;
@@ -3408,15 +3416,10 @@ static void perf_event_comm_event(struct
rcu_read_lock();
cpuctx = &get_cpu_var(perf_cpu_context);
perf_event_comm_ctx(&cpuctx->ctx, comm_event);
- put_cpu_var(perf_cpu_context);
-
- /*
- * doesn't really matter which of the child contexts the
- * events ends up in.
- */
ctx = rcu_dereference(current->perf_event_ctxp);
if (ctx)
perf_event_comm_ctx(ctx, comm_event);
+ put_cpu_var(perf_cpu_context);
rcu_read_unlock();
}
@@ -3491,6 +3494,9 @@ static void perf_event_mmap_output(struc
static int perf_event_mmap_match(struct perf_event *event,
struct perf_mmap_event *mmap_event)
{
+ if (event->cpu != -1 && event->cpu != smp_processor_id())
+ return 0;
+
if (event->attr.mmap)
return 1;
@@ -3564,15 +3570,10 @@ got_name:
rcu_read_lock();
cpuctx = &get_cpu_var(perf_cpu_context);
perf_event_mmap_ctx(&cpuctx->ctx, mmap_event);
- put_cpu_var(perf_cpu_context);
-
- /*
- * doesn't really matter which of the child contexts the
- * events ends up in.
- */
ctx = rcu_dereference(current->perf_event_ctxp);
if (ctx)
perf_event_mmap_ctx(ctx, mmap_event);
+ put_cpu_var(perf_cpu_context);
rcu_read_unlock();
kfree(buf);
@@ -3863,6 +3864,9 @@ static int perf_swevent_match(struct per
struct perf_sample_data *data,
struct pt_regs *regs)
{
+ if (event->cpu != -1 && event->cpu != smp_processor_id())
+ return 0;
+
if (!perf_swevent_is_counting(event))
return 0;
--
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-12-17 12:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-12-17 12:16 [PATCH 0/6] a perf and some sched patches Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-17 12:16 ` [PATCH 1/6] sched: Move TASK_STATE_TO_CHAR_STR near the TASK_state bits Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-17 12:30 ` [tip:sched/urgent] " tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-17 12:16 ` [PATCH 2/6] sched: Add missing state chars to TASK_STATE_TO_CHAR_STR Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-17 12:31 ` [tip:sched/urgent] " tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-17 12:16 ` [PATCH 3/6] sched: Update task_state_arraypwith new states Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-17 12:31 ` [tip:sched/urgent] " tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-17 12:16 ` [PATCH 4/6] sched: Assert task state bits at build time Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-17 12:31 ` [tip:sched/urgent] " tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-17 12:16 ` [PATCH 5/6] sched: Fix broken assertion Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-17 12:31 ` [tip:sched/urgent] " tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-17 12:16 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2009-12-17 12:30 ` [tip:perf/urgent] perf events: Dont report side-band events on each cpu for per-task-per-cpu events tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-17 12:23 ` [PATCH 0/6] a perf and some sched patches Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091217121830.215333434@chello.nl \
--to=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox