From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S934567AbZLQMUx (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Dec 2009 07:20:53 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1764647AbZLQMTM (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Dec 2009 07:19:12 -0500 Received: from casper.infradead.org ([85.118.1.10]:47321 "EHLO casper.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1764643AbZLQMTJ (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Dec 2009 07:19:09 -0500 Message-Id: <20091217121830.215333434@chello.nl> References: <20091217121626.682772324@chello.nl> User-Agent: quilt/0.46-1 Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 13:16:32 +0100 From: Peter Zijlstra To: Ingo Molnar Cc: Thomas Gleixner , LKML , Peter Zijlstra , Paul Mackerras Subject: [PATCH 6/6] perf: Dont report side-band events on each cpu for per-task-per-cpu events Content-Disposition: inline; filename=perf4.patch Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Acme noticed that his FORK/MMAP numbers were inflated by about the same factor as his cpu-count. This led to the discovery of a few more sites that need to respect the event->cpu filter. Reported-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Paul Mackerras --- kernel/perf_event.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++-------------- 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) Index: linux-2.6/kernel/perf_event.c =================================================================== --- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/perf_event.c +++ linux-2.6/kernel/perf_event.c @@ -1381,6 +1381,9 @@ static void perf_ctx_adjust_freq(struct if (event->state != PERF_EVENT_STATE_ACTIVE) continue; + if (event->cpu != -1 && event->cpu != smp_processor_id()) + continue; + hwc = &event->hw; interrupts = hwc->interrupts; @@ -3265,6 +3268,9 @@ static void perf_event_task_output(struc static int perf_event_task_match(struct perf_event *event) { + if (event->cpu != -1 && event->cpu != smp_processor_id()) + return 0; + if (event->attr.comm || event->attr.mmap || event->attr.task) return 1; @@ -3290,12 +3296,11 @@ static void perf_event_task_event(struct rcu_read_lock(); cpuctx = &get_cpu_var(perf_cpu_context); perf_event_task_ctx(&cpuctx->ctx, task_event); - put_cpu_var(perf_cpu_context); - if (!ctx) ctx = rcu_dereference(task_event->task->perf_event_ctxp); if (ctx) perf_event_task_ctx(ctx, task_event); + put_cpu_var(perf_cpu_context); rcu_read_unlock(); } @@ -3372,6 +3377,9 @@ static void perf_event_comm_output(struc static int perf_event_comm_match(struct perf_event *event) { + if (event->cpu != -1 && event->cpu != smp_processor_id()) + return 0; + if (event->attr.comm) return 1; @@ -3408,15 +3416,10 @@ static void perf_event_comm_event(struct rcu_read_lock(); cpuctx = &get_cpu_var(perf_cpu_context); perf_event_comm_ctx(&cpuctx->ctx, comm_event); - put_cpu_var(perf_cpu_context); - - /* - * doesn't really matter which of the child contexts the - * events ends up in. - */ ctx = rcu_dereference(current->perf_event_ctxp); if (ctx) perf_event_comm_ctx(ctx, comm_event); + put_cpu_var(perf_cpu_context); rcu_read_unlock(); } @@ -3491,6 +3494,9 @@ static void perf_event_mmap_output(struc static int perf_event_mmap_match(struct perf_event *event, struct perf_mmap_event *mmap_event) { + if (event->cpu != -1 && event->cpu != smp_processor_id()) + return 0; + if (event->attr.mmap) return 1; @@ -3564,15 +3570,10 @@ got_name: rcu_read_lock(); cpuctx = &get_cpu_var(perf_cpu_context); perf_event_mmap_ctx(&cpuctx->ctx, mmap_event); - put_cpu_var(perf_cpu_context); - - /* - * doesn't really matter which of the child contexts the - * events ends up in. - */ ctx = rcu_dereference(current->perf_event_ctxp); if (ctx) perf_event_mmap_ctx(ctx, mmap_event); + put_cpu_var(perf_cpu_context); rcu_read_unlock(); kfree(buf); @@ -3863,6 +3864,9 @@ static int perf_swevent_match(struct per struct perf_sample_data *data, struct pt_regs *regs) { + if (event->cpu != -1 && event->cpu != smp_processor_id()) + return 0; + if (!perf_swevent_is_counting(event)) return 0; --