public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Subject: [PATCH 3/6] sched: Remove rq_iterator usage from load_balance_fair
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 19:50:24 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091217185430.424905819@chello.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20091217185021.684424629@chello.nl

[-- Attachment #1: sched-lb-3.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 4409 bytes --]

Since we only ever iterate the fair class, do away with this
abstraction.

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
---
 kernel/sched_fair.c |   80 ++++++++++++++++++----------------------------------
 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 51 deletions(-)

Index: linux-2.6/kernel/sched_fair.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/sched_fair.c
+++ linux-2.6/kernel/sched_fair.c
@@ -1866,26 +1866,9 @@ static unsigned long
 balance_tasks(struct rq *this_rq, int this_cpu, struct rq *busiest,
 		unsigned long max_load_move, struct sched_domain *sd,
 		enum cpu_idle_type idle, int *all_pinned,
-		int *this_best_prio, struct rq_iterator *iterator);
+		int *this_best_prio, struct cfs_rq *busiest_cfs_rq);
 
 
-static unsigned long
-__load_balance_fair(struct rq *this_rq, int this_cpu, struct rq *busiest,
-		unsigned long max_load_move, struct sched_domain *sd,
-		enum cpu_idle_type idle, int *all_pinned, int *this_best_prio,
-		struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
-{
-	struct rq_iterator cfs_rq_iterator;
-
-	cfs_rq_iterator.start = load_balance_start_fair;
-	cfs_rq_iterator.next = load_balance_next_fair;
-	cfs_rq_iterator.arg = cfs_rq;
-
-	return balance_tasks(this_rq, this_cpu, busiest,
-			max_load_move, sd, idle, all_pinned,
-			this_best_prio, &cfs_rq_iterator);
-}
-
 #ifdef CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED
 static unsigned long
 load_balance_fair(struct rq *this_rq, int this_cpu, struct rq *busiest,
@@ -1915,9 +1898,9 @@ load_balance_fair(struct rq *this_rq, in
 		rem_load = (u64)rem_load_move * busiest_weight;
 		rem_load = div_u64(rem_load, busiest_h_load + 1);
 
-		moved_load = __load_balance_fair(this_rq, this_cpu, busiest,
+		moved_load = balance_tasks(this_rq, this_cpu, busiest,
 				rem_load, sd, idle, all_pinned, this_best_prio,
-				tg->cfs_rq[busiest_cpu]);
+				busiest_cfs_rq);
 
 		if (!moved_load)
 			continue;
@@ -1940,7 +1923,7 @@ load_balance_fair(struct rq *this_rq, in
 		  struct sched_domain *sd, enum cpu_idle_type idle,
 		  int *all_pinned, int *this_best_prio)
 {
-	return __load_balance_fair(this_rq, this_cpu, busiest,
+	return balance_tasks(this_rq, this_cpu, busiest,
 			max_load_move, sd, idle, all_pinned,
 			this_best_prio, &busiest->cfs);
 }
@@ -2050,53 +2033,48 @@ static unsigned long
 balance_tasks(struct rq *this_rq, int this_cpu, struct rq *busiest,
 	      unsigned long max_load_move, struct sched_domain *sd,
 	      enum cpu_idle_type idle, int *all_pinned,
-	      int *this_best_prio, struct rq_iterator *iterator)
+	      int *this_best_prio, struct cfs_rq *busiest_cfs_rq)
 {
 	int loops = 0, pulled = 0, pinned = 0;
-	struct task_struct *p;
 	long rem_load_move = max_load_move;
+	struct task_struct *p, *n;
 
 	if (max_load_move == 0)
 		goto out;
 
 	pinned = 1;
 
-	/*
-	 * Start the load-balancing iterator:
-	 */
-	p = iterator->start(iterator->arg);
-next:
-	if (!p || loops++ > sysctl_sched_nr_migrate)
-		goto out;
+	list_for_each_entry_safe(p, n, &busiest_cfs_rq->tasks, se.group_node) {
+		if (loops++ > sysctl_sched_nr_migrate)
+			break;
 
-	if ((p->se.load.weight >> 1) > rem_load_move ||
-	    !can_migrate_task(p, busiest, this_cpu, sd, idle, &pinned)) {
-		p = iterator->next(iterator->arg);
-		goto next;
-	}
+		if ((p->se.load.weight >> 1) > rem_load_move ||
+		    !can_migrate_task(p, busiest, this_cpu, sd, idle, &pinned))
+			continue;
 
-	pull_task(busiest, p, this_rq, this_cpu);
-	pulled++;
-	rem_load_move -= p->se.load.weight;
+		pull_task(busiest, p, this_rq, this_cpu);
+		pulled++;
+		rem_load_move -= p->se.load.weight;
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT
-	/*
-	 * NEWIDLE balancing is a source of latency, so preemptible kernels
-	 * will stop after the first task is pulled to minimize the critical
-	 * section.
-	 */
-	if (idle == CPU_NEWLY_IDLE)
-		goto out;
+		/*
+		 * NEWIDLE balancing is a source of latency, so preemptible
+		 * kernels will stop after the first task is pulled to minimize
+		 * the critical section.
+		 */
+		if (idle == CPU_NEWLY_IDLE)
+			break;
 #endif
 
-	/*
-	 * We only want to steal up to the prescribed amount of weighted load.
-	 */
-	if (rem_load_move > 0) {
+		/*
+		 * We only want to steal up to the prescribed amount of
+		 * weighted load.
+		 */
+		if (rem_load_move <= 0)
+			break;
+
 		if (p->prio < *this_best_prio)
 			*this_best_prio = p->prio;
-		p = iterator->next(iterator->arg);
-		goto next;
 	}
 out:
 	/*

-- 


  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-12-17 19:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-12-17 18:50 [PATCH 0/6] Some load-balancer cleanups Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-17 18:50 ` [PATCH 1/6] sched: Move load balance code into sched_fair.c Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-17 18:50 ` [PATCH 2/6] sched: Remove the sched_class load_balance methods Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-17 18:50 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2009-12-17 18:50 ` [PATCH 4/6] sched: Remove rq_iterator from move_one_task Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-17 18:50 ` [PATCH 5/6] sched: Remove from fwd decls Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-17 18:50 ` [PATCH 6/6] sched: Add a lock break for PREEMPT=y Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-18  6:57 ` [PATCH 0/6] Some load-balancer cleanups Ingo Molnar
2009-12-18  9:37   ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-23 15:13 ` [PATCH 7/6][RFC] sched: unify load_balance{,_newidle}() Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-24  4:43   ` Mike Galbraith
2009-12-24  9:29     ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-24 10:01       ` Mike Galbraith
2009-12-24 10:09       ` Mike Galbraith
2009-12-24 10:16         ` Mike Galbraith
2009-12-24 10:16         ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-24 12:55           ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-24 17:43             ` Mike Galbraith
2009-12-23 15:13 ` [PATCH 8/6][RFC] sched: Remove load_balance_newidle() Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20091217185430.424905819@chello.nl \
    --to=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=efault@gmx.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox