From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
To: "K.Prasad" <prasad@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"mingo@elte.hu" <mingo@elte.hu>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [Patch 1/1] Introduce register_user_hbp_by_pid() and unregister_user_hbp_by_pid()
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 21:47:48 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091218204744.GC5004@nowhere> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091217172253.GC5457@in.ibm.com>
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 10:52:53PM +0530, K.Prasad wrote:
> Provide an interface to (un)register user-space breakpoints using a
> process' pid.
>
> Signed-off-by: K.Prasad <prasad@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
> include/linux/hw_breakpoint.h | 8 +++
> kernel/hw_breakpoint.c | 92 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 100 insertions(+)
>
> Index: linux-2.6-tip.reg_by_pid/include/linux/hw_breakpoint.h
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6-tip.reg_by_pid.orig/include/linux/hw_breakpoint.h
> +++ linux-2.6-tip.reg_by_pid/include/linux/hw_breakpoint.h
> @@ -54,6 +54,10 @@ register_user_hw_breakpoint(struct perf_
> perf_overflow_handler_t triggered,
> struct task_struct *tsk);
>
> +extern int register_user_hbp_by_pid(struct perf_event_attr *attr,
> + perf_overflow_handler_t triggered,
> + pid_t pid);
> +extern void unregister_user_hbp_by_pid(pid_t pid);
> /* FIXME: only change from the attr, and don't unregister */
> extern int
> modify_user_hw_breakpoint(struct perf_event *bp, struct perf_event_attr *attr);
> @@ -91,6 +95,10 @@ static inline struct perf_event *
> register_user_hw_breakpoint(struct perf_event_attr *attr,
> perf_overflow_handler_t triggered,
> struct task_struct *tsk) { return NULL; }
> +int register_user_hbp_by_pid(struct perf_event_attr *attr,
> + perf_overflow_handler_t triggered,
> + pid_t pid) { return 0; }
> +void unregister_user_hbp_by_pid(pid_t pid) {}
> static inline int
> modify_user_hw_breakpoint(struct perf_event *bp,
> struct perf_event_attr *attr) { return -ENOSYS; }
> Index: linux-2.6-tip.reg_by_pid/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6-tip.reg_by_pid.orig/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c
> +++ linux-2.6-tip.reg_by_pid/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c
> @@ -298,6 +298,98 @@ int register_perf_hw_breakpoint(struct p
> return ret;
> }
>
> +/*
> + * Unregister breakpoints thread-by-thread, for all threads ranging from
> + * @start to @end.
> + */
> +static inline void __unregister_user_hbp_for_threads(struct task_struct *start,
> + struct task_struct *end)
I'm not sure this wants to be inlined. The function is not not
that tiny. May be let the compiler choose?
> +{
> + struct perf_event *bp, *temp_bp;
> +
> + do {
> + mutex_lock(&start->perf_event_mutex);
> + list_for_each_entry_safe(bp, temp_bp, &start->perf_event_list,
> + owner_entry) {
> + if (bp->attr.type != PERF_TYPE_BREAKPOINT)
> + continue;
> + unregister_hw_breakpoint(bp);
> + break;
Do you really want to unregister all of them? What about those
that may have been registered using perf syscall?
> +/**
> + * register_user_hbp_by_pid - register a hardware breakpoint for user space using pid
> + * @attr: breakpoint attributes
> + * @triggered: callback to trigger when we hit the breakpoint
> + * @pid: pid of the thread group for which breakpoints must be registered
> + */
> +int register_user_hbp_by_pid(struct perf_event_attr *attr,
> + perf_overflow_handler_t triggered,
> + pid_t pid)
> +{
> + int ret;
> + struct task_struct *t1, *t2;
This needs rcu_read_lock()
> + t1 = t2 = find_task_by_vpid(pid);
> + if (t1 == NULL)
> + return -ESRCH;
> +
> + /*
> + * Ensure that the breakpoint propogates to every new thread created in
> + * this thread_group.
> + */
> + attr->inherit = 1;
> + /*
> + * Register a breakpoint individually for every thread of the
> + * thread_group using register_user_hw_breakpoint() interface.
> + * Warning: Involves redundant validation checks using
> + * arch_validate_hwbkpt_settings().
> + */
> + do {
> + ret = IS_ERR(register_user_hw_breakpoint(attr, triggered, t1));
> + if (ret)
> + goto fail;
> + t1 = next_thread(t1);
> + } while (t1 != t2);
And this needs rcu_read_unlock()
> + return 0;
> +fail:
> + /*
> + * Check if the very first register_user_hw_breakpoint() request
> + * failed. If then, do nothing but return the error value.
> + */
> + if (t1 == t2)
> + return ret;
> + /*
> + * Since there exists a thread where the breakpoint request was not
> + * successful, we are unable to provide a process-wide breakpoint. Hence
> + * cleanup the breakpoints from the previously registered threads.
> + */
> + __unregister_user_hbp_for_threads(t2, t1);
There too.
Once you play with tasks (if it's not current), and iterate
through these, you need to protect either by read-lock
tasklist_lock or using rcu.
Rcu is the much prefered way here.
> +/**
> + * unregister_hbp_by_pid - unregister a user-space hardware breakpoint previously registered using a pid
> + * @pid: pid of the process for which breakpoint must be unregistered
> + */
> +void unregister_user_hbp_by_pid(pid_t pid)
> +{
> + struct task_struct *t1, *t2;
> +
> + t1 = t2 = find_task_by_vpid(pid);
> + if (t1 == NULL)
> + return;
> +
> + __unregister_user_hbp_for_threads(t1, t2);
And this function needs rcu too.
I don't see any in-kernel user for this new feature.
That would be required to integrate it.
Thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-12-18 20:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-12-17 17:20 [Patch 0/1] Enable user-space breakpoint requests using PID K.Prasad
2009-12-17 17:22 ` [Patch 1/1] Introduce register_user_hbp_by_pid() and unregister_user_hbp_by_pid() K.Prasad
2009-12-18 20:47 ` Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
2009-12-21 18:46 ` K.Prasad
2009-12-30 22:28 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-12-31 18:48 ` K.Prasad
2010-01-10 4:00 ` Frederic Weisbecker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091218204744.GC5004@nowhere \
--to=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=prasad@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox