From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@infradead.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@elte.hu>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Frédéric Weisbecker" <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
"Mike Galbraith" <efault@gmx.de>,
"Paul Mackerras" <paulus@samba.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] perf record: We should fork only if a program was specified to run
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 18:58:53 -0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091218205853.GD19708@ghostprotocols.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1261169561.20899.630.camel@laptop>
Em Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 09:52:41PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra escreveu:
> On Fri, 2009-12-18 at 18:42 -0200, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
> > @@ -422,7 +422,8 @@ static int __cmd_record(int argc __used, const char **argv)
> > signal(SIGCHLD, sig_handler);
> > signal(SIGINT, sig_handler);
> >
> > - if (pipe(child_ready_pipe) < 0 || pipe(go_pipe) < 0) {
> > + if (target_pid == -1 && argc > 0 &&
> > + (pipe(child_ready_pipe) < 0 || pipe(go_pipe) < 0)) {
> > perror("failed to create pipes");
> > exit(-1);
> > }
>
> Why bother?
Because we don't need it?
> > @@ -483,7 +484,7 @@ static int __cmd_record(int argc __used, const char **argv)
> >
> > atexit(atexit_header);
> >
> > - if (target_pid == -1) {
> > + if (target_pid == -1 && argc > 0) {
> > pid = fork();
> > if (pid < 0) {
> > perror("failed to fork");
>
> I'd write:
>
> target_pid == -1 && !system_wide
Because we want this to work:
[root@doppio linux-2.6-tip]# perf record -a -f sleep 2
[ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ]
[ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.243 MB perf.data (~10599 samples) ]
[root@doppio linux-2.6-tip]#
See, no hands mother! I.e. it is system wide, but just for 2 seconds,
its clever, but I like it, and it always worked :-)
> > @@ -667,7 +668,7 @@ int cmd_record(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix __used)
> >
> > argc = parse_options(argc, argv, options, record_usage,
> > PARSE_OPT_STOP_AT_NON_OPTION);
> > - if (!argc && target_pid == -1 && (!system_wide || profile_cpu == -1))
> > + if (!argc && target_pid == -1 && !system_wide)
> > usage_with_options(record_usage, options);
> >
> > symbol__init();
>
> Right, so I was thinking -C would be enough to also start profiling..
> clearly messed up the logic though :/
Yeah, it should, meaning "profile everything on CPU N"
- Arnaldo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-12-18 20:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-12-18 20:42 [PATCH 1/1] perf record: We should fork only if a program was specified to run Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2009-12-18 20:52 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-18 20:58 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [this message]
2009-12-18 21:13 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-18 22:03 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-12-18 21:29 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-20 10:31 ` Xiao Guangrong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091218205853.GD19708@ghostprotocols.net \
--to=acme@infradead.org \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox