From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca>
To: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>
Subject: Re: [this_cpu_xx V8 11/16] Generic support for this_cpu_cmpxchg
Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2009 09:45:20 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091219144520.GA9134@Krystal> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091218222653.560936448@quilx.com>
* Christoph Lameter (cl@linux-foundation.org) wrote:
> Provide support for this_cpu_cmpxchg.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>
>
> ---
> include/linux/percpu.h | 99 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 99 insertions(+)
>
> Index: linux-2.6/include/linux/percpu.h
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/include/linux/percpu.h 2009-12-18 15:17:05.000000000 -0600
> +++ linux-2.6/include/linux/percpu.h 2009-12-18 15:33:12.000000000 -0600
> @@ -443,6 +443,62 @@ do { \
> # define this_cpu_xor(pcp, val) __pcpu_size_call(this_cpu_or_, (pcp), (val))
> #endif
>
> +static inline unsigned long __this_cpu_cmpxchg_generic(volatile void *pptr,
> + unsigned long old, unsigned long new, int size)
> +{
> + unsigned long prev;
> + volatile void * ptr = __this_cpu_ptr(pptr);
> +
> + switch (size) {
> + case 1: prev = *(u8 *)ptr;
> + if (prev == old)
> + *(u8 *)ptr = (u8)new;
> + break;
> + case 2: prev = *(u16 *)ptr;
> + if (prev == old)
> + *(u16 *)ptr = (u16)new;
> + break;
> + case 4: prev = *(u32 *)ptr;
> + if (prev == old)
> + *(u32 *)ptr = (u32)new;
> + break;
> + case 8: prev = *(u64 *)ptr;
> + if (prev == old)
> + *(u64 *)ptr = (u64)new;
> + break;
> + default:
> + __bad_size_call_parameter();
> + }
> + return prev;
> +}
Hi Christoph,
I am a bit concerned about the "generic" version of this_cpu_cmpxchg.
Given that what LTTng needs is basically an atomic, nmi-safe version of
the primitive (on all architectures that have something close to a NMI),
this means that it could not switch over to your primitives until we add
the equivalent support we currently have with local_t to all
architectures. The transition would be faster if we create an
atomic_cpu_*() variant which would map to local_t operations in the
initial version.
Or maybe have I missed something in your patchset that address this ?
Thanks,
Mathieu
> +
> +static inline unsigned long this_cpu_cmpxchg_generic(volatile void *ptr,
> + unsigned long old, unsigned long new, int size)
> +{
> + unsigned long prev;
> +
> + preempt_disable();
> + prev = __this_cpu_cmpxchg_generic(ptr, old, new, size);
> + preempt_enable();
> + return prev;
> +}
> +
> +#ifndef this_cpu_cmpxchg
> +# ifndef this_cpu_cmpxchg_1
> +# define this_cpu_cmpxchg_1(pcp, old, new) this_cpu_cmpxchg_generic((pcp), (old), (new), 1)
> +# endif
> +# ifndef this_cpu_cmpxchg_2
> +# define this_cpu_cmpxchg_2(pcp, old, new) this_cpu_cmpxchg_generic((pcp), (old), (new), 2)
> +# endif
> +# ifndef this_cpu_cmpxchg_4
> +# define this_cpu_cmpxchg_4(pcp, old, new) this_cpu_cmpxchg_generic((pcp), (old), (new), 4)
> +# endif
> +# ifndef this_cpu_cmpxchg_8
> +# define this_cpu_cmpxchg_8(pcp, old, new) this_cpu_cmpxchg_generic((pcp), (old), (new), 8)
> +# endif
> +# define this_cpu_cmpxchg(pcp, old, new) __pcpu_size_call_return(__this_cpu_cmpxchg_, (old), (new))
> +#endif
> +
> /*
> * Generic percpu operations that do not require preemption handling.
> * Either we do not care about races or the caller has the
> @@ -594,6 +650,22 @@ do { \
> # define __this_cpu_xor(pcp, val) __pcpu_size_call(__this_cpu_xor_, (pcp), (val))
> #endif
>
> +#ifndef __this_cpu_cmpxchg
> +# ifndef __this_cpu_cmpxchg_1
> +# define __this_cpu_cmpxchg_1(pcp, old, new) __this_cpu_cmpxchg_generic((pcp), (old), (new), 1)
> +# endif
> +# ifndef __this_cpu_cmpxchg_2
> +# define __this_cpu_cmpxchg_2(pcp, old, new) __this_cpu_cmpxchg_generic((pcp), (old), (new), 2)
> +# endif
> +# ifndef __this_cpu_cmpxchg_4
> +# define __this_cpu_cmpxchg_4(pcp, old, new) __this_cpu_cmpxchg_generic((pcp), (old), (new), 4)
> +# endif
> +# ifndef __this_cpu_cmpxchg_8
> +# define __this_cpu_cmpxchg_8(pcp, old, new) __this_cpu_cmpxchg_generic((pcp), (old), (new), 8)
> +# endif
> +# define __this_cpu_cmpxchg(pcp, old, new) __pcpu_size_call_return(__this_cpu_cmpxchg_, (old), (new))
> +#endif
> +
> /*
> * IRQ safe versions of the per cpu RMW operations. Note that these operations
> * are *not* safe against modification of the same variable from another
> @@ -709,4 +781,31 @@ do { \
> # define irqsafe_cpu_xor(pcp, val) __pcpu_size_call(irqsafe_cpu_xor_, (val))
> #endif
>
> +static inline unsigned long irqsafe_cpu_cmpxchg_generic(volatile void *ptr,
> + unsigned long old, unsigned long new, int size)
> +{
> + unsigned long flags, prev;
> +
> + local_irq_save(flags);
> + prev = __this_cpu_cmpxchg_generic(ptr, old, new, size);
> + local_irq_restore(flags);
> + return prev;
> +}
> +
> +#ifndef irqsafe_cpu_cmpxchg
> +# ifndef irqsafe_cpu_cmpxchg_1
> +# define irqsafe_cpu_cmpxchg_1(pcp, old, new) irqsafe_cpu_cmpxchg_generic(((pcp), (old), (new), 1)
> +# endif
> +# ifndef irqsafe_cpu_cmpxchg_2
> +# define irqsafe_cpu_cmpxchg_2(pcp, old, new) irqsafe_cpu_cmpxchg_generic(((pcp), (old), (new), 2)
> +# endif
> +# ifndef irqsafe_cpu_cmpxchg_4
> +# define irqsafe_cpu_cmpxchg_4(pcp, old, new) irqsafe_cpu_cmpxchg_generic(((pcp), (old), (new), 4)
> +# endif
> +# ifndef irqsafe_cpu_cmpxchg_8
> +# define irqsafe_cpu_cmpxchg_8(pcp, old, new) irqsafe_cpu_cmpxchg_generic(((pcp), (old), (new), 8)
> +# endif
> +# define irqsafe_cpu_cmpxchg(pcp, old, new) __pcpu_size_call_return(irqsafe_cpu_cmpxchg_, (old), (new))
> +#endif
> +
> #endif /* __LINUX_PERCPU_H */
>
> --
--
Mathieu Desnoyers
OpenPGP key fingerprint: 8CD5 52C3 8E3C 4140 715F BA06 3F25 A8FE 3BAE 9A68
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-12-19 14:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-12-18 22:26 [this_cpu_xx V8 00/16] Per cpu atomics in core allocators, cleanup and more this_cpu_ops Christoph Lameter
2009-12-18 22:26 ` [this_cpu_xx V8 01/16] this_cpu_ops: page allocator conversion Christoph Lameter
2009-12-18 22:26 ` [this_cpu_xx V8 02/16] this_cpu ops: Remove pageset_notifier Christoph Lameter
2009-12-18 22:26 ` [this_cpu_xx V8 03/16] Use this_cpu operations in slub Christoph Lameter
2009-12-20 9:11 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-12-18 22:26 ` [this_cpu_xx V8 04/16] SLUB: Get rid of dynamic DMA kmalloc cache allocation Christoph Lameter
2009-12-18 22:26 ` [this_cpu_xx V8 05/16] this_cpu: Remove slub kmem_cache fields Christoph Lameter
2009-12-18 22:26 ` [this_cpu_xx V8 06/16] Make slub statistics use this_cpu_inc Christoph Lameter
2009-12-18 22:26 ` [this_cpu_xx V8 07/16] Module handling: Use this_cpu_xx to dynamically allocate counters Christoph Lameter
2009-12-21 7:47 ` Tejun Heo
2009-12-21 7:59 ` Tejun Heo
2009-12-21 8:19 ` Tejun Heo
2009-12-21 23:28 ` Rusty Russell
2009-12-22 0:02 ` Tejun Heo
2009-12-22 16:17 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-12-22 15:58 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-12-22 15:57 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-12-23 2:07 ` Tejun Heo
2010-01-04 17:22 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-01-04 17:51 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-12-18 22:26 ` [this_cpu_xx V8 08/16] Remove cpu_local_xx macros Christoph Lameter
2009-12-18 22:26 ` [this_cpu_xx V8 09/16] Allow arch to provide inc/dec functionality for each size separately Christoph Lameter
2009-12-21 7:25 ` Tejun Heo
2009-12-22 15:56 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-12-23 2:08 ` Tejun Heo
2009-12-18 22:26 ` [this_cpu_xx V8 10/16] Support generating inc/dec for this_cpu_inc/dec Christoph Lameter
2009-12-18 22:26 ` [this_cpu_xx V8 11/16] Generic support for this_cpu_cmpxchg Christoph Lameter
2009-12-19 14:45 ` Mathieu Desnoyers [this message]
2009-12-22 15:54 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-12-22 17:24 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2010-01-04 17:21 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-01-05 22:29 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2010-01-05 22:35 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-12-18 22:26 ` [this_cpu_xx V8 12/16] Add percpu cmpxchg operations Christoph Lameter
2009-12-18 22:26 ` [this_cpu_xx V8 13/16] Generic support for this_cpu_xchg Christoph Lameter
2009-12-18 22:26 ` [this_cpu_xx V8 14/16] x86 percpu xchg operation Christoph Lameter
2009-12-18 22:26 ` [this_cpu_xx V8 15/16] Generic support for this_cpu_add_return() Christoph Lameter
2009-12-18 22:26 ` [this_cpu_xx V8 16/16] x86 support for this_cpu_add_return Christoph Lameter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091219144520.GA9134@Krystal \
--to=mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca \
--cc=cl@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mel@csn.ul.ie \
--cc=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox