public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alex Chiang <achiang@hp.com>
To: venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com, lenb@kernel.org
Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
	linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: [PATCH v2 05/11] ACPI: processor: finish unifying arch_acpi_processor_init_pdc()
Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2009 12:30:49 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091220193049.5545.92202.stgit@bob.kio> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091220192731.5545.20582.stgit@bob.kio>

The only thing arch-specific about calling _PDC is what bits get
set in the input obj_list buffer.

There's no need for several levels of indirection to twiddle those
bits. Additionally, since we're just messing around with a buffer,
we can simplify the interface; no need to pass around the entire
struct acpi_processor * just to get at the buffer.

Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Chiang <achiang@hp.com>
---

 arch/ia64/include/asm/acpi.h      |    4 ++++
 arch/ia64/kernel/acpi-processor.c |   18 ------------------
 arch/x86/include/asm/acpi.h       |   19 +++++++++++++++++++
 arch/x86/kernel/acpi/processor.c  |   34 ----------------------------------
 drivers/acpi/processor_pdc.c      |    6 +++---
 include/acpi/processor.h          |    1 -
 6 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 56 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/ia64/include/asm/acpi.h b/arch/ia64/include/asm/acpi.h
index 3b78882..7ae5889 100644
--- a/arch/ia64/include/asm/acpi.h
+++ b/arch/ia64/include/asm/acpi.h
@@ -133,6 +133,10 @@ extern int __initdata nid_to_pxm_map[MAX_NUMNODES];
 #endif
 
 static inline bool arch_has_acpi_pdc(void) { return true; }
+static inline void arch_acpi_set_pdc_bits(u32 *buf)
+{
+	buf[2] |= ACPI_PDC_EST_CAPABILITY_SMP;
+}
 
 #define acpi_unlazy_tlb(x)
 
diff --git a/arch/ia64/kernel/acpi-processor.c b/arch/ia64/kernel/acpi-processor.c
index ebe23f5..7ba5acc 100644
--- a/arch/ia64/kernel/acpi-processor.c
+++ b/arch/ia64/kernel/acpi-processor.c
@@ -14,24 +14,6 @@
 #include <acpi/processor.h>
 #include <asm/acpi.h>
 
-static void init_intel_pdc(struct acpi_processor *pr)
-{
-	u32 *buf = (u32 *)pr->pdc->pointer->buffer.pointer;
-
-	buf[2] |= ACPI_PDC_EST_CAPABILITY_SMP;
-
-	return;
-}
-
-/* Initialize _PDC data based on the CPU vendor */
-void arch_acpi_processor_init_pdc(struct acpi_processor *pr)
-{
-	init_intel_pdc(pr);
-	return;
-}
-
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(arch_acpi_processor_init_pdc);
-
 void arch_acpi_processor_cleanup_pdc(struct acpi_processor *pr)
 {
 	if (pr->pdc) {
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/acpi.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/acpi.h
index d787e6e..56f462c 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/acpi.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/acpi.h
@@ -149,6 +149,25 @@ static inline bool arch_has_acpi_pdc(void)
 		c->x86_vendor == X86_VENDOR_CENTAUR);
 }
 
+static inline void arch_acpi_set_pdc_bits(u32 *buf)
+{
+	struct cpuinfo_x86 *c = &cpu_data(0);
+
+	buf[2] |= ACPI_PDC_C_CAPABILITY_SMP;
+
+	if (cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_EST))
+		buf[2] |= ACPI_PDC_EST_CAPABILITY_SWSMP;
+
+	if (cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_ACPI))
+		buf[2] |= ACPI_PDC_T_FFH;
+
+	/*
+	 * If mwait/monitor is unsupported, C2/C3_FFH will be disabled
+	 */
+	if (!cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_MWAIT))
+		buf[2] &= ~(ACPI_PDC_C_C2C3_FFH);
+}
+
 #else /* !CONFIG_ACPI */
 
 #define acpi_lapic 0
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/processor.c b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/processor.c
index d722ca8..0f57307 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/processor.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/processor.c
@@ -12,40 +12,6 @@
 #include <acpi/processor.h>
 #include <asm/acpi.h>
 
-static void init_intel_pdc(struct acpi_processor *pr, struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
-{
-	u32 *buf = (u32 *)pr->pdc->pointer->buffer.pointer;
-
-	buf[2] |= ACPI_PDC_C_CAPABILITY_SMP;
-
-	if (cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_EST))
-		buf[2] |= ACPI_PDC_EST_CAPABILITY_SWSMP;
-
-	if (cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_ACPI))
-		buf[2] |= ACPI_PDC_T_FFH;
-
-	/*
-	 * If mwait/monitor is unsupported, C2/C3_FFH will be disabled
-	 */
-	if (!cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_MWAIT))
-		buf[2] &= ~(ACPI_PDC_C_C2C3_FFH);
-
-	return;
-}
-
-
-/* Initialize _PDC data based on the CPU vendor */
-void arch_acpi_processor_init_pdc(struct acpi_processor *pr)
-{
-	struct cpuinfo_x86 *c = &cpu_data(pr->id);
-
-	init_intel_pdc(pr, c);
-
-	return;
-}
-
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(arch_acpi_processor_init_pdc);
-
 void arch_acpi_processor_cleanup_pdc(struct acpi_processor *pr)
 {
 	if (pr->pdc) {
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/processor_pdc.c b/drivers/acpi/processor_pdc.c
index ccda7c9..48df08e 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/processor_pdc.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/processor_pdc.c
@@ -40,6 +40,9 @@ static void acpi_set_pdc_bits(u32 *buf)
 
 	/* Enable coordination with firmware's _TSD info */
 	buf[2] = ACPI_PDC_SMP_T_SWCOORD;
+
+	/* Twiddle arch-specific bits needed for _PDC */
+	arch_acpi_set_pdc_bits(buf);
 }
 
 static void acpi_processor_init_pdc(struct acpi_processor *pr)
@@ -81,9 +84,6 @@ static void acpi_processor_init_pdc(struct acpi_processor *pr)
 	obj_list->pointer = obj;
 	pr->pdc = obj_list;
 
-	/* Now let the arch do the bit-twiddling to buf[] */
-	arch_acpi_processor_init_pdc(pr);
-
 	return;
 }
 
diff --git a/include/acpi/processor.h b/include/acpi/processor.h
index a1b748a..50edd73 100644
--- a/include/acpi/processor.h
+++ b/include/acpi/processor.h
@@ -257,7 +257,6 @@ int acpi_processor_notify_smm(struct module *calling_module);
 DECLARE_PER_CPU(struct acpi_processor *, processors);
 extern struct acpi_processor_errata errata;
 
-void arch_acpi_processor_init_pdc(struct acpi_processor *pr);
 void arch_acpi_processor_cleanup_pdc(struct acpi_processor *pr);
 
 #ifdef ARCH_HAS_POWER_INIT


  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-12-20 19:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-12-20 19:30 [PATCH v2 00/11] ACPI: early _PDC eval and unify x86/ia64 Alex Chiang
2009-12-20 19:30 ` [PATCH v2 01/11] ACPI: processor: call _PDC early Alex Chiang
2009-12-21  1:34   ` Lin Ming
2009-12-21  2:19     ` Alex Chiang
2009-12-20 19:30 ` [PATCH v2 02/11] ACPI: processor: introduce arch_has_acpi_pdc Alex Chiang
2009-12-20 19:30 ` [PATCH v2 03/11] ACPI: processor: unify arch_acpi_processor_init_pdc Alex Chiang
2009-12-20 19:30 ` [PATCH v2 04/11] ACPI: processor: factor out common _PDC settings Alex Chiang
2009-12-20 19:30 ` Alex Chiang [this message]
2009-12-20 19:30 ` [PATCH v2 06/11] ACPI: processor: unify arch_acpi_processor_cleanup_pdc Alex Chiang
2009-12-20 19:30 ` [PATCH v2 07/11] ACPI: processor: introduce acpi_processor_alloc_pdc() Alex Chiang
2009-12-20 19:31 ` [PATCH v2 08/11] ACPI: processor: change acpi_processor_eval_pdc interface Alex Chiang
2009-12-20 19:31 ` [PATCH v2 09/11] ACPI: processor: open code acpi_processor_cleanup_pdc Alex Chiang
2009-12-20 19:31 ` [PATCH v2 10/11] ACPI: processor: change acpi_processor_set_pdc() interface Alex Chiang
2009-12-20 19:31 ` [PATCH v2 11/11] ACPI: processor: remove _PDC object list from struct acpi_processor Alex Chiang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20091220193049.5545.92202.stgit@bob.kio \
    --to=achiang@hp.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox