From: Alex Chiang <achiang@hp.com>
To: venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com, lenb@kernel.org
Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: [PATCH v2 05/11] ACPI: processor: finish unifying arch_acpi_processor_init_pdc()
Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2009 12:30:49 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091220193049.5545.92202.stgit@bob.kio> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091220192731.5545.20582.stgit@bob.kio>
The only thing arch-specific about calling _PDC is what bits get
set in the input obj_list buffer.
There's no need for several levels of indirection to twiddle those
bits. Additionally, since we're just messing around with a buffer,
we can simplify the interface; no need to pass around the entire
struct acpi_processor * just to get at the buffer.
Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Chiang <achiang@hp.com>
---
arch/ia64/include/asm/acpi.h | 4 ++++
arch/ia64/kernel/acpi-processor.c | 18 ------------------
arch/x86/include/asm/acpi.h | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
arch/x86/kernel/acpi/processor.c | 34 ----------------------------------
drivers/acpi/processor_pdc.c | 6 +++---
include/acpi/processor.h | 1 -
6 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 56 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/ia64/include/asm/acpi.h b/arch/ia64/include/asm/acpi.h
index 3b78882..7ae5889 100644
--- a/arch/ia64/include/asm/acpi.h
+++ b/arch/ia64/include/asm/acpi.h
@@ -133,6 +133,10 @@ extern int __initdata nid_to_pxm_map[MAX_NUMNODES];
#endif
static inline bool arch_has_acpi_pdc(void) { return true; }
+static inline void arch_acpi_set_pdc_bits(u32 *buf)
+{
+ buf[2] |= ACPI_PDC_EST_CAPABILITY_SMP;
+}
#define acpi_unlazy_tlb(x)
diff --git a/arch/ia64/kernel/acpi-processor.c b/arch/ia64/kernel/acpi-processor.c
index ebe23f5..7ba5acc 100644
--- a/arch/ia64/kernel/acpi-processor.c
+++ b/arch/ia64/kernel/acpi-processor.c
@@ -14,24 +14,6 @@
#include <acpi/processor.h>
#include <asm/acpi.h>
-static void init_intel_pdc(struct acpi_processor *pr)
-{
- u32 *buf = (u32 *)pr->pdc->pointer->buffer.pointer;
-
- buf[2] |= ACPI_PDC_EST_CAPABILITY_SMP;
-
- return;
-}
-
-/* Initialize _PDC data based on the CPU vendor */
-void arch_acpi_processor_init_pdc(struct acpi_processor *pr)
-{
- init_intel_pdc(pr);
- return;
-}
-
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(arch_acpi_processor_init_pdc);
-
void arch_acpi_processor_cleanup_pdc(struct acpi_processor *pr)
{
if (pr->pdc) {
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/acpi.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/acpi.h
index d787e6e..56f462c 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/acpi.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/acpi.h
@@ -149,6 +149,25 @@ static inline bool arch_has_acpi_pdc(void)
c->x86_vendor == X86_VENDOR_CENTAUR);
}
+static inline void arch_acpi_set_pdc_bits(u32 *buf)
+{
+ struct cpuinfo_x86 *c = &cpu_data(0);
+
+ buf[2] |= ACPI_PDC_C_CAPABILITY_SMP;
+
+ if (cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_EST))
+ buf[2] |= ACPI_PDC_EST_CAPABILITY_SWSMP;
+
+ if (cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_ACPI))
+ buf[2] |= ACPI_PDC_T_FFH;
+
+ /*
+ * If mwait/monitor is unsupported, C2/C3_FFH will be disabled
+ */
+ if (!cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_MWAIT))
+ buf[2] &= ~(ACPI_PDC_C_C2C3_FFH);
+}
+
#else /* !CONFIG_ACPI */
#define acpi_lapic 0
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/processor.c b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/processor.c
index d722ca8..0f57307 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/processor.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/processor.c
@@ -12,40 +12,6 @@
#include <acpi/processor.h>
#include <asm/acpi.h>
-static void init_intel_pdc(struct acpi_processor *pr, struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
-{
- u32 *buf = (u32 *)pr->pdc->pointer->buffer.pointer;
-
- buf[2] |= ACPI_PDC_C_CAPABILITY_SMP;
-
- if (cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_EST))
- buf[2] |= ACPI_PDC_EST_CAPABILITY_SWSMP;
-
- if (cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_ACPI))
- buf[2] |= ACPI_PDC_T_FFH;
-
- /*
- * If mwait/monitor is unsupported, C2/C3_FFH will be disabled
- */
- if (!cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_MWAIT))
- buf[2] &= ~(ACPI_PDC_C_C2C3_FFH);
-
- return;
-}
-
-
-/* Initialize _PDC data based on the CPU vendor */
-void arch_acpi_processor_init_pdc(struct acpi_processor *pr)
-{
- struct cpuinfo_x86 *c = &cpu_data(pr->id);
-
- init_intel_pdc(pr, c);
-
- return;
-}
-
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(arch_acpi_processor_init_pdc);
-
void arch_acpi_processor_cleanup_pdc(struct acpi_processor *pr)
{
if (pr->pdc) {
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/processor_pdc.c b/drivers/acpi/processor_pdc.c
index ccda7c9..48df08e 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/processor_pdc.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/processor_pdc.c
@@ -40,6 +40,9 @@ static void acpi_set_pdc_bits(u32 *buf)
/* Enable coordination with firmware's _TSD info */
buf[2] = ACPI_PDC_SMP_T_SWCOORD;
+
+ /* Twiddle arch-specific bits needed for _PDC */
+ arch_acpi_set_pdc_bits(buf);
}
static void acpi_processor_init_pdc(struct acpi_processor *pr)
@@ -81,9 +84,6 @@ static void acpi_processor_init_pdc(struct acpi_processor *pr)
obj_list->pointer = obj;
pr->pdc = obj_list;
- /* Now let the arch do the bit-twiddling to buf[] */
- arch_acpi_processor_init_pdc(pr);
-
return;
}
diff --git a/include/acpi/processor.h b/include/acpi/processor.h
index a1b748a..50edd73 100644
--- a/include/acpi/processor.h
+++ b/include/acpi/processor.h
@@ -257,7 +257,6 @@ int acpi_processor_notify_smm(struct module *calling_module);
DECLARE_PER_CPU(struct acpi_processor *, processors);
extern struct acpi_processor_errata errata;
-void arch_acpi_processor_init_pdc(struct acpi_processor *pr);
void arch_acpi_processor_cleanup_pdc(struct acpi_processor *pr);
#ifdef ARCH_HAS_POWER_INIT
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-12-20 19:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-12-20 19:30 [PATCH v2 00/11] ACPI: early _PDC eval and unify x86/ia64 Alex Chiang
2009-12-20 19:30 ` [PATCH v2 01/11] ACPI: processor: call _PDC early Alex Chiang
2009-12-21 1:34 ` Lin Ming
2009-12-21 2:19 ` Alex Chiang
2009-12-20 19:30 ` [PATCH v2 02/11] ACPI: processor: introduce arch_has_acpi_pdc Alex Chiang
2009-12-20 19:30 ` [PATCH v2 03/11] ACPI: processor: unify arch_acpi_processor_init_pdc Alex Chiang
2009-12-20 19:30 ` [PATCH v2 04/11] ACPI: processor: factor out common _PDC settings Alex Chiang
2009-12-20 19:30 ` Alex Chiang [this message]
2009-12-20 19:30 ` [PATCH v2 06/11] ACPI: processor: unify arch_acpi_processor_cleanup_pdc Alex Chiang
2009-12-20 19:30 ` [PATCH v2 07/11] ACPI: processor: introduce acpi_processor_alloc_pdc() Alex Chiang
2009-12-20 19:31 ` [PATCH v2 08/11] ACPI: processor: change acpi_processor_eval_pdc interface Alex Chiang
2009-12-20 19:31 ` [PATCH v2 09/11] ACPI: processor: open code acpi_processor_cleanup_pdc Alex Chiang
2009-12-20 19:31 ` [PATCH v2 10/11] ACPI: processor: change acpi_processor_set_pdc() interface Alex Chiang
2009-12-20 19:31 ` [PATCH v2 11/11] ACPI: processor: remove _PDC object list from struct acpi_processor Alex Chiang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091220193049.5545.92202.stgit@bob.kio \
--to=achiang@hp.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox