From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752794AbZLUNuv (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Dec 2009 08:50:51 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752008AbZLUNut (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Dec 2009 08:50:49 -0500 Received: from e8.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.138]:52063 "EHLO e8.ny.us.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750702AbZLUNus (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Dec 2009 08:50:48 -0500 Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 19:20:43 +0530 From: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli To: Oleg Nesterov Cc: Andrew Morton , Alexey Dobriyan , Andi Kleen , Christoph Hellwig , "Frank Ch. Eigler" , Ingo Molnar , Peter Zijlstra , Roland McGrath , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, utrace-devel@redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/7] implement utrace-ptrace Message-ID: <20091221135043.GC12670@in.ibm.com> Reply-To: ananth@in.ibm.com References: <20091218011140.GA29570@redhat.com> <20091221134837.GB12670@in.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20091221134837.GB12670@in.ibm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 07:18:37PM +0530, Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli wrote: > On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 02:11:40AM +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > > The patch adds the new file, kernel/ptrace-utrace.c, which contains > > the new implementation of ptrace over utrace. > > > > This file is not compiled until we have CONFIG_UTRACE option, will be > > added by the next "utrace core" patch. > > > > It's supposed to be an invisible implementation change, nothing should > > change to userland when CONFIG_UTRACE is enabled. > > > > Signed-off-by: Roland McGrath > > Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov > > --- > > Oleg, > > ptrace/utrace performs better with the ptrace-tests [1] testsuite (1 failure > vs. 3 with vanilla ptrace [1]). The gdb testsuite also has no > regressions. In fact, the results on the gdb testsuite are identical. Forgot to mention the tests were on powerpc.