public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
To: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
	torvalds@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	jbeulich@novell.com, rguenther@suse.de, arnd@arndb.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix BUILD_BUG_ON in fs/compat_ioctl.c to build with gcc 4.5 snapshot
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 01:13:57 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091222001357.GJ25372@basil.fritz.box> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200912221014.02545.rusty@rustcorp.com.au>

> No, it's solving the same problem, generically.  There are numerous places
> where we want to use BUILD_BUG_ON() but we don't have a constant expression.
> Look for MAYBE_BUILD_BUG_ON().

Ok so you're saying that should be just a MAYBE_BUILD_BUG_ON()? 

> 
> Subject: BUILD_BUG_ON: make it handle more cases
> 
> BUILD_BUG_ON used to use the optimizer to do code elimination or fail
> at link time; it was changed to first the size of a negative array (a
> nicer compile time error), then (in
> 8c87df457cb58fe75b9b893007917cf8095660a0) to a bitfield.
> 
> bitfields: needs a literal constant at parse time, and can't be put under
> 	"if (__builtin_constant_p(x))" for example.
> negative array: can handle anything, but if the compiler can't tell it's
> 	a constant, silently has no effect.
> link time: breaks link if the compiler can't determine the value, but the
> 	linker output is not usually as informative as a compiler error.
> 
> If we use the negative-array-size method *and* the link time trick,
> we get the ability to use BUILD_BUG_ON() under __builtin_constant_p()
> branches, and maximal ability for the compiler to detect errors at
> build time.

Ok maybe that works, but we need a fix for 2.6.33 too.

-Andi


  reply	other threads:[~2009-12-22  0:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-12-20 16:53 [PATCH] Fix BUILD_BUG_ON in fs/compat_ioctl.c to build with gcc 4.5 snapshot Andi Kleen
2009-12-21 10:32 ` Rusty Russell
2009-12-21 10:51   ` Andi Kleen
2009-12-21 23:44     ` Rusty Russell
2009-12-22  0:13       ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2009-12-21 16:48 ` Arnd Bergmann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20091222001357.GJ25372@basil.fritz.box \
    --to=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=jbeulich@novell.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rguenther@suse.de \
    --cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox