From: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
To: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
jbeulich@novell.com, rguenther@suse.de, arnd@arndb.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix BUILD_BUG_ON in fs/compat_ioctl.c to build with gcc 4.5 snapshot
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 01:13:57 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091222001357.GJ25372@basil.fritz.box> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200912221014.02545.rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
> No, it's solving the same problem, generically. There are numerous places
> where we want to use BUILD_BUG_ON() but we don't have a constant expression.
> Look for MAYBE_BUILD_BUG_ON().
Ok so you're saying that should be just a MAYBE_BUILD_BUG_ON()?
>
> Subject: BUILD_BUG_ON: make it handle more cases
>
> BUILD_BUG_ON used to use the optimizer to do code elimination or fail
> at link time; it was changed to first the size of a negative array (a
> nicer compile time error), then (in
> 8c87df457cb58fe75b9b893007917cf8095660a0) to a bitfield.
>
> bitfields: needs a literal constant at parse time, and can't be put under
> "if (__builtin_constant_p(x))" for example.
> negative array: can handle anything, but if the compiler can't tell it's
> a constant, silently has no effect.
> link time: breaks link if the compiler can't determine the value, but the
> linker output is not usually as informative as a compiler error.
>
> If we use the negative-array-size method *and* the link time trick,
> we get the ability to use BUILD_BUG_ON() under __builtin_constant_p()
> branches, and maximal ability for the compiler to detect errors at
> build time.
Ok maybe that works, but we need a fix for 2.6.33 too.
-Andi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-12-22 0:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-12-20 16:53 [PATCH] Fix BUILD_BUG_ON in fs/compat_ioctl.c to build with gcc 4.5 snapshot Andi Kleen
2009-12-21 10:32 ` Rusty Russell
2009-12-21 10:51 ` Andi Kleen
2009-12-21 23:44 ` Rusty Russell
2009-12-22 0:13 ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2009-12-21 16:48 ` Arnd Bergmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091222001357.GJ25372@basil.fritz.box \
--to=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=jbeulich@novell.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rguenther@suse.de \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox