Re: workqueue thing

Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-22T11:08:22Z

On Tue, 2009-12-22 at 08:50 +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
>
> > 3) gets fragile at memory-pressure/reclaim
>
> Shared dynamic pool is going to be affected by memory pressure no
> matter how you implement it. cmwq tries to maintain stable level of
> workers and has forward progress guarantee. If you're gonna do shared
> pool, it can't get much better.

And here I'm questioning the very need for shared stuff, I don't see
any. That is, I'm not seeing it being worth the hassle.