public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
	"Smith, GeoffX" <geoffx.smith@intel.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Michael Stone <michael@laptop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] prctl: return MCE process flags through pointer
Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 10:52:23 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091223095223.GB20539@basil.fritz.box> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091222173424.980d5d33.akpm@linux-foundation.org>

On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 05:34:24PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Dec 2009 02:14:51 +0100 Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org> wrote:
> 
> > "Smith, GeoffX" <geoffx.smith@intel.com> writes:
> > 
> > > This patch fixes the semantics of prctl() option PR_MCE_KILL_GET 
> > > to pass the return value through *arg2.
> > >
> > > With this change, the option now follows the same conventions as the
> > > other "get" options added since 2.6.0, and also brings it into
> > > conformance with the advice in chapter 16 of Documentation/CodingStyle.
> > >
> > > This prctl() option was only added within the last month, so there are
> > > not any production applications to break.  This patch applies cleanly
> > > to mainline and to 2.6.32.2 for backporting.
> > 
> > It breaks the test suite, the man pages, qemu and one slide deck at least.
> > 
> 
> Should've got it right the first time.

To be honest it's not fully clear to me what is "wrong" with returning
the return value with "return".

If there was a security bug or something maybe such a radical step
as changing a published API would be justified, but for this I'm sceptical.

> 
> What goes wrong with qemu?

It's the main current user of this interface currently.

-Andi

-- 
ak@linux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.

  reply	other threads:[~2009-12-23  9:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-12-23  0:33 [PATCH] prctl: return MCE process flags through pointer Smith, GeoffX
2009-12-23  1:14 ` Andi Kleen
2009-12-23  1:34   ` Andrew Morton
2009-12-23  9:52     ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2009-12-23 10:18       ` Andrew Morton
2009-12-23 17:56         ` Smith, GeoffX
2009-12-23 18:54           ` Andrew Morton
2009-12-23 20:24             ` Smith, GeoffX
2009-12-25  8:35             ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-12-23 19:31           ` Andi Kleen
2009-12-25  8:30         ` Arjan van de Ven

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20091223095223.GB20539@basil.fritz.box \
    --to=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=geoffx.smith@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=michael@laptop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox