From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756036AbZLWOyH (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Dec 2009 09:54:07 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753144AbZLWOyG (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Dec 2009 09:54:06 -0500 Received: from mail-iw0-f171.google.com ([209.85.223.171]:56272 "EHLO mail-iw0-f171.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750986AbZLWOyF (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Dec 2009 09:54:05 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references :mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to :user-agent; b=CM2Q4G7ht3OIuqzXKAtiEj+3NaiSws8gsp0zi09UjUi44EwsMbe1bWGt+POHh/TL27 CzSwW4cjHqh51Sq8noSCAQi0+07cNzvzcRpZ48ACzWP9WPKrynXQEV2GoAUM0mbDGYpZ ApVudzNWMFwX22nRhQUERUCJQyNYAeamkbiQo= Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 16:53:36 +0200 From: Dan Carpenter To: Herbert Xu Cc: Matt Mackall , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: double unlock in rng_dev_read() Message-ID: <20091223145336.GB23721@bicker> Mail-Followup-To: Dan Carpenter , Herbert Xu , Matt Mackall , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20091223131552.GA17923@bicker> <20091223143658.GA30992@gondor.apana.org.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20091223143658.GA30992@gondor.apana.org.au> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 10:36:58PM +0800, Herbert Xu wrote: > On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 03:15:52PM +0200, Dan Carpenter wrote: > > It seems like we unlock rng_mutex twice (2.6.33-rc1). > > > > drivers/char/hw_random/core.c > > 151 mutex_unlock(&rng_mutex); > > 152 > > 153 if (need_resched()) > > 154 schedule_timeout_interruptible(1); > > 155 > > 156 if (signal_pending(current)) { > > 157 err = -ERESTARTSYS; > > 158 goto out; > > 159 } > > 160 } > > 161 out_unlock: > > 162 mutex_unlock(&rng_mutex); > > Hmm, are you sure you didn't mistake out for out_unlock? :) No no. I mean when size hits zero we are rng_mutex is unlocked. regards, dan carpenter > -- > Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/ > Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} > Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ > PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt