From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Cc: torvalds@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
uclinux-dev@uclinux.org, Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] FDPIC: Respect PT_GNU_STACK exec protection markings when creating NOMMU stack
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2009 13:57:04 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091230135704.ccd0a129.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091222171725.11854.10647.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
So these patches and the MN10300 ones didn't get merged. Presumably
because they're a grabbag of fixes and non-fixes and kinda-fixes with
no particular ordering or precedence and they arrived newly-minted
several days after the release of -rc1.
I could suggest that you go back and sort them into 2.6.33-appropriate
fixes and 2.6.34-appropriate non-fixes.
Or you could try to cook up a good-sounding reason why the whole lot
needs to go into 2.6.33. If you believe that ;)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-12-30 21:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-12-22 17:17 [PATCH 1/4] FDPIC: Respect PT_GNU_STACK exec protection markings when creating NOMMU stack David Howells
2009-12-22 17:17 ` [PATCH 2/4] NOMMU: Avoiding duplicate icache flushes of shared maps David Howells
2009-12-22 17:17 ` [PATCH 3/4] NOMMU: Use copy_*_user_page() in access_process_vm() David Howells
2009-12-22 17:17 ` [PATCH 4/4] elf_fdpic_core_dump(): fix build break in 2.6.33-rc1 David Howells
2009-12-30 21:57 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2009-12-31 11:15 ` [PATCH 1/4] FDPIC: Respect PT_GNU_STACK exec protection markings when creating NOMMU stack David Howells
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-01-06 17:23 David Howells
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091230135704.ccd0a129.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=uclinux-dev@uclinux.org \
--cc=vapier@gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox