From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752118AbZL3V5d (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Dec 2009 16:57:33 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752073AbZL3V5d (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Dec 2009 16:57:33 -0500 Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([140.211.169.13]:38461 "EHLO smtp1.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751951AbZL3V5c (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Dec 2009 16:57:32 -0500 Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2009 13:57:04 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: David Howells Cc: torvalds@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, uclinux-dev@uclinux.org, Mike Frysinger Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] FDPIC: Respect PT_GNU_STACK exec protection markings when creating NOMMU stack Message-Id: <20091230135704.ccd0a129.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20091222171725.11854.10647.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk> References: <20091222171725.11854.10647.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.8 (GTK+ 2.12.9; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org So these patches and the MN10300 ones didn't get merged. Presumably because they're a grabbag of fixes and non-fixes and kinda-fixes with no particular ordering or precedence and they arrived newly-minted several days after the release of -rc1. I could suggest that you go back and sort them into 2.6.33-appropriate fixes and 2.6.34-appropriate non-fixes. Or you could try to cook up a good-sounding reason why the whole lot needs to go into 2.6.33. If you believe that ;)