From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
To: Wenji Huang <wenji.huang@oracle.com>
Cc: John Kacur <jkacur@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, acme@redhat.com, mingo@elte.hu
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf: fix incorrect return value for else case
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2009 23:12:15 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091230221213.GH6322@nowhere> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4B302070.5000905@oracle.com>
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 09:27:12AM +0800, Wenji Huang wrote:
> John Kacur wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 10:22 AM, Wenji Huang <wenji.huang@oracle.com> wrote:
>>> Return original cmd instead of adding prefix.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Wenji Huang <wenji.huang@oracle.com>
>>> ---
>>> tools/perf/builtin-help.c | 2 +-
>>> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-help.c b/tools/perf/builtin-help.c
>>> index 9f810b1..ca77df5 100644
>>> --- a/tools/perf/builtin-help.c
>>> +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-help.c
>>> @@ -317,7 +317,7 @@ static const char *cmd_to_page(const char *perf_cmd)
>>> else if (is_perf_command(perf_cmd))
>>> return prepend("perf-", perf_cmd);
>>> else
>>> - return prepend("perf-", perf_cmd);
>>> + return perf_cmd;
>>> }
>>>
>>> static void setup_man_path(void)
>>> --
>>> 1.5.6
>>
>> Sorry - I believe we should NAK this patch.
>> It would turn the following
>>
>> ./perf nonsuchcmd --help
>> No manual entry for perf-nonsuchcmd
>>
>> into
>>
>> ./perf nonsuchcmd --help
>> No manual entry for nonsuchcmd
>>
>> The former is correct, the name of the man page includes the prefix "perf-"
>>
>> NAK
>>
>> (cc-ing Frederic in case he sees it differently)
I personally don't mind.
Having either
./perf nonsuchcmd --help
No manual entry for perf-nonsuchcmd
or
./perf nonsuchcmd --help
No manual entry for nonsuchcmd
both make sense for the user.
>>
> Thanks. Since we think the former is better, why not make
> the code compact? Like,
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-help.c b/tools/perf/builtin-help.c
> index 9f810b1..65e2691 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/builtin-help.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-help.c
> @@ -314,8 +314,6 @@ static const char *cmd_to_page(const char *perf_cmd)
> return "perf";
> else if (!prefixcmp(perf_cmd, "perf"))
> return perf_cmd;
> - else if (is_perf_command(perf_cmd))
> - return prepend("perf-", perf_cmd);
> else
> return prepend("perf-", perf_cmd);
> }
Agreed!
Thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-12-30 22:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-12-21 9:22 [PATCH] perf: fix incorrect return value for else case Wenji Huang
2009-12-21 15:23 ` John Kacur
2009-12-22 1:27 ` Wenji Huang
2009-12-30 22:12 ` Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
2010-01-13 8:45 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091230221213.GH6322@nowhere \
--to=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=acme@redhat.com \
--cc=jkacur@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=wenji.huang@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox