From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752436Ab0ABVBS (ORCPT ); Sat, 2 Jan 2010 16:01:18 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752000Ab0ABVBS (ORCPT ); Sat, 2 Jan 2010 16:01:18 -0500 Received: from thunk.org ([69.25.196.29]:54269 "EHLO thunker.thunk.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752039Ab0ABVBR (ORCPT ); Sat, 2 Jan 2010 16:01:17 -0500 Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2010 16:01:01 -0500 From: tytso@mit.edu To: Frederic Weisbecker Cc: Andi Kleen , Linus Torvalds , LKML , Christian Kujau , Alexander Beregalov , Chris Mason , Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: reiserfs broken in 2.6.32 was Re: [GIT PULL] reiserfs fixes Message-ID: <20100102210101.GN828@thunk.org> Mail-Followup-To: tytso@mit.edu, Frederic Weisbecker , Andi Kleen , Linus Torvalds , LKML , Christian Kujau , Alexander Beregalov , Chris Mason , Ingo Molnar References: <1262395636-8647-1-git-send-regression-fweisbec@gmail.com> <87bphc7heo.fsf@basil.nowhere.org> <20100102163644.GA5076@nowhere> <20100102174311.GA30016@basil.fritz.box> <20100102190213.GC5076@nowhere> <20100102192337.GB30016@basil.fritz.box> <20100102201138.GF5076@nowhere> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100102201138.GF5076@nowhere> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: tytso@thunk.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on thunker.thunk.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Jan 02, 2010 at 09:11:39PM +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote: > > I've never lost any datas since I began this work. And > I run it every day. If I had experienced lock inversions, > and sometimes soft lockups, I did not experienced serious > damages. It's a journalized filesystem that can fixup the things > pretty well. Have you tried using the xfsqa regression test suite? Despite the name, it will work on non-xfs filesystems (although there are some XFS-specific tests in the test suite.) Both the btrfs and ext4 developers use it to debug their file systems, and it's a good way of stressing the file system in all sorts of different ways that might not be seen during normal desktop usage. I suspect it would be a good way of flushing out potential problems for reiserfs as well. Regards, - Ted