From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752592Ab0ABVG7 (ORCPT ); Sat, 2 Jan 2010 16:06:59 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752369Ab0ABVG6 (ORCPT ); Sat, 2 Jan 2010 16:06:58 -0500 Received: from mail-ew0-f219.google.com ([209.85.219.219]:34741 "EHLO mail-ew0-f219.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752528Ab0ABVG5 (ORCPT ); Sat, 2 Jan 2010 16:06:57 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=BxroIWEWC79OcmE5ekVI4uL0e1vyz/4IwU8s3523YPbz3M8X2fZPSYL3m/IcyusC06 M1Ou0t9NgOsH9uBefP9Qtnatof8Canh1D9zgg6cdG17mrhsnWOTV4vwFkBy8S+sZwhvY htdyFxvSlhWtjkJ3dvfy9+lo7Ck+QzD3VpFdQ= Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2010 22:06:55 +0100 From: Frederic Weisbecker To: tytso@mit.edu Cc: Andi Kleen , Linus Torvalds , LKML , Christian Kujau , Alexander Beregalov , Chris Mason , Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: reiserfs broken in 2.6.32 was Re: [GIT PULL] reiserfs fixes Message-ID: <20100102210653.GH5076@nowhere> References: <1262395636-8647-1-git-send-regression-fweisbec@gmail.com> <87bphc7heo.fsf@basil.nowhere.org> <20100102163644.GA5076@nowhere> <20100102174311.GA30016@basil.fritz.box> <20100102190213.GC5076@nowhere> <20100102192337.GB30016@basil.fritz.box> <20100102201138.GF5076@nowhere> <20100102210101.GN828@thunk.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100102210101.GN828@thunk.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Jan 02, 2010 at 04:01:01PM -0500, tytso@mit.edu wrote: > On Sat, Jan 02, 2010 at 09:11:39PM +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote: > > > > I've never lost any datas since I began this work. And > > I run it every day. If I had experienced lock inversions, > > and sometimes soft lockups, I did not experienced serious > > damages. It's a journalized filesystem that can fixup the things > > pretty well. > > Have you tried using the xfsqa regression test suite? Despite the > name, it will work on non-xfs filesystems (although there are some > XFS-specific tests in the test suite.) Both the btrfs and ext4 > developers use it to debug their file systems, and it's a good way of > stressing the file system in all sorts of different ways that might > not be seen during normal desktop usage. I suspect it would be a good > way of flushing out potential problems for reiserfs as well. > > Regards, Thanks! I'm going to test it now. I've been running a stress test from Chris Mason which basically checks races on parallel writes/read. If this testsuite includes more checks, like xattr and some other things, then that's exactly what I was searching. I guess this is the right place to get it? git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/fs/xfs/xfstests-dev.git Thanks.