From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752380Ab0ABVLL (ORCPT ); Sat, 2 Jan 2010 16:11:11 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751916Ab0ABVLK (ORCPT ); Sat, 2 Jan 2010 16:11:10 -0500 Received: from mx3.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.1.138]:34060 "EHLO mx3.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751685Ab0ABVLJ (ORCPT ); Sat, 2 Jan 2010 16:11:09 -0500 Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2010 22:10:58 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar To: Andi Kleen Cc: Frederic Weisbecker , Linus Torvalds , LKML , Christian Kujau , Alexander Beregalov , Chris Mason Subject: Re: reiserfs broken in 2.6.32 was Re: [GIT PULL] reiserfs fixes Message-ID: <20100102211058.GA11026@elte.hu> References: <1262395636-8647-1-git-send-regression-fweisbec@gmail.com> <87bphc7heo.fsf@basil.nowhere.org> <20100102163644.GA5076@nowhere> <20100102174311.GA30016@basil.fritz.box> <20100102190213.GC5076@nowhere> <20100102192337.GB30016@basil.fritz.box> <20100102201138.GF5076@nowhere> <20100102203305.GC30016@basil.fritz.box> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100102203305.GC30016@basil.fritz.box> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-08-17) X-ELTE-SpamScore: 1.2 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: s X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=1.2 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00,FH_DATE_PAST_20XX autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.2.5 3.2 FH_DATE_PAST_20XX The date is grossly in the future. -2.0 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Andi Kleen wrote: > > We could also have a reiserfs-no-bkl config option that would pick the > > duplicated code base. Again I fear few people will test it. > > That sounds reasonable, at least have a workaround if there are too many > problems. Uhm, i think Frederic meant that a bit mockingly. Judging on past experience related to the BKL, introducing such a config option is one of the worst options possible. IMHO you are giving pretty bad unsolicited advice here. Thanks, Ingo