From: Johannes Stezenbach <js@sig21.net>
To: Hans Werner <HWerner4@gmx.de>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, trenn@suse.de, mmalygin@ked.de,
hancockrwd@gmail.com, greg@kroah.com
Subject: Re: Samsung N130 ATA exception after 5min uptime -- Phoenix FailSafe issue?
Date: Sun, 3 Jan 2010 23:11:42 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100103221142.GA16783@sig21.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091230120428.5780@gmx.net>
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 01:04:28PM +0100, Hans Werner wrote:
>
> testing in the Arch Linux Forums has shown that if one applies
> a patch which you posted to the linux-ide ML on 2008-11-21
> then the problem is no longer seen. Instead the kernel log shows
> that a spurious IRQ was cleared.
>
> [PATCH #upstraem-fixes] ata_piix: detect and clear spurious IRQs
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-ide&m=122724081603679&w=2
> http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=86454
>
> What's the current status of this patch? Is it safe to use?
> What does it tell us about the Samsung N130/140?
FWIW, I just tested a current git kernel (v2.6.33-rc2-268-g45d28b0)
with Tejun's patch applied on my N130. The ATA exception and hang is
indeed gone, just "ata1: clearing spurious IRQ" is logged.
I've see Tejun's comment in
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14314
and I would like to add that the ATA irq is not shared.
14: 43885 0 IO-APIC-edge ata_piix
15: 0 0 IO-APIC-edge ata_piix
Thanks,
Johannes
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-01-03 22:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-12-30 12:04 Samsung N130 ATA exception after 5min uptime -- Phoenix FailSafe issue? Hans Werner
2010-01-03 22:11 ` Johannes Stezenbach [this message]
2010-01-03 22:59 ` Tejun Heo
2010-01-04 0:41 ` Johannes Stezenbach
2010-01-04 0:56 ` Tejun Heo
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-11-26 16:42 Johannes Stezenbach
2009-11-28 19:19 ` Greg KH
2009-11-28 20:30 ` Robert Hancock
2009-11-28 21:34 ` Greg KH
2009-11-28 22:22 ` Johannes Stezenbach
2009-11-29 0:17 ` Greg KH
2009-11-29 0:51 ` Johannes Stezenbach
2009-11-30 8:52 ` Tejun Heo
2009-11-30 10:21 ` Johannes Stezenbach
2009-11-30 11:06 ` Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100103221142.GA16783@sig21.net \
--to=js@sig21.net \
--cc=HWerner4@gmx.de \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=hancockrwd@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mmalygin@ked.de \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=trenn@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox