From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753902Ab0ADUGS (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Jan 2010 15:06:18 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752776Ab0ADUGR (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Jan 2010 15:06:17 -0500 Received: from cantor.suse.de ([195.135.220.2]:56894 "EHLO mx1.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752751Ab0ADUGQ (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Jan 2010 15:06:16 -0500 Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 12:04:36 -0800 From: Greg KH To: Dmitry Torokhov Cc: LKML Subject: Re: Need to take dev->sem, do it directly or use wrapper? Message-ID: <20100104200436.GA22515@suse.de> References: <20100104185023.GA2597@core.coreip.homeip.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100104185023.GA2597@core.coreip.homeip.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jan 04, 2010 at 10:50:23AM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > Greg, > > I was looking at restructuring serio a bit and rely more on the > infrastructure in the drivre core now that it is more flexible. It all > looks good except for one detail - serio provides "reconnect" method > which allows user to reinitialize a port whithout tearing down its > children input devices. To properly serialize with probe(), remove() and > other bus operations I'd need to take dev->sem semaphore. I(s bus code > allowed to do this? Can I do it directly or we need to add a wrapper > (like device_serialize_access(dev, bool))? Adding a wrapper would be best to do. thanks, greg k-h