Re: [patch 0/6] cpumask_of_node() should handle -1 as a node

Andrew Morton
2010-01-11T22:11:47Z

On Wed, 06 Jan 2010 15:55:09 +1100
Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org> wrote:

> A number of places in the kernel use cpumask_of_node(-1), but most arch
> NUMA implementations are broken. The following patches fix this.
>

So.. what's happening here? Nobody has applied the patches anywhere,
you later said "the scheduler oopses in a number of places with
CPUMASK_OFFSTACK and sparse node ids" and mention of a -stable backport
was mentioned.