public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>,
	caiqian@redhat.com, Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
	Jan Kratochvil <jkratoch@redhat.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
	utrace-devel@redhat.com
Subject: Re: s390 && user_enable_single_step() (Was: odd utrace testing results on s390x)
Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 21:23:47 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100106202347.GC26204@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100105105030.66bb8a0a@mschwide.boeblingen.de.ibm.com>

On 01/05, Martin Schwidefsky wrote:
>
> On Mon,  4 Jan 2010 13:11:47 -0800 (PST)
> Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> > > This probably means that copy_process()->user_disable_single_step()
> > > is not enough to clear the "this task wants single-stepping" copied
> > > from parent.
> >
> > I would suspect s390's TIF_SINGLE_STEP flag here.  That flag means "a
> > single-step trap occurred".  This is what causes do_single_step to be
> > called before returning to user mode, rather than the machine trap doing it
> > directly as is done in the other arch implementations.
>
> Just my thinking as well.
>
> > If I'm right, then "this task wants single-stepping" is not the problem,
> > and that really is fully cleared.  In fact, looking at s390's copy_thread
> > (arch/s390/kernel/process.c) it clears out all the state that is actually
> > touched by user_enable_single_step and user_disable_single_step.  So for
> > s390 the new fork.c call is actually superfluous AFAICT.
>
>         /* Don't copy debug registers */
>         memset(&p->thread.per_info, 0, sizeof(p->thread.per_info));
>
> Yep, the call from fork.c is indeed superfluous.

I can't explain this, but if I remove copy_process()->user_disable_single_step()
the test-case below triggers "XXX" printk's from do_single_step() with or
without CONFIG_UTRACE. the patch is

	--- arch/s390/kernel/traps.c~	2009-12-22 10:41:52.909174198 -0500
	+++ arch/s390/kernel/traps.c	2010-01-05 11:03:55.006487697 -0500
	@@ -384,6 +384,9 @@ void __kprobes do_single_step(struct pt_
		}
		if (tracehook_consider_fatal_signal(current, SIGTRAP))
			force_sig(SIGTRAP, current);
	+	else
	+		printk("XXX: %s/%d %d\n", current->comm, current->pid,
	+				test_thread_flag(TIF_SINGLE_STEP));
	 }
	 
	 static void default_trap_handler(struct pt_regs * regs, long interruption_code)

Oleg.

#include <stdio.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <signal.h>
#include <sys/ptrace.h>
#include <sys/wait.h>
#include <assert.h>

int main(void)
{
	int pid, status;

	if (!(pid = fork())) {
		assert(ptrace(PTRACE_TRACEME) == 0);
		kill(getpid(), SIGSTOP);

		if (!fork())
			return 43;

		wait(&status);
		return WEXITSTATUS(status);
	}


	for (;;) {
		assert(pid == wait(&status));
		if (WIFEXITED(status))
			break;
		assert(ptrace(PTRACE_SINGLESTEP, pid, 0,0) == 0);
	}

	assert(WEXITSTATUS(status) == 43);
	return 0;
}



  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-01-06 20:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <1503844142.2061111261478093776.JavaMail.root@zmail06.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com>
     [not found] ` <1257887498.2061171261478252049.JavaMail.root@zmail06.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com>
2010-01-04 15:52   ` s390 && user_enable_single_step() (Was: odd utrace testing results on s390x) Oleg Nesterov
2010-01-04 16:16     ` Martin Schwidefsky
2010-01-04 18:14       ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-01-04 19:30         ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-01-04 21:11         ` Roland McGrath
2010-01-05  9:50           ` Martin Schwidefsky
2010-01-05 15:36             ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-01-05 15:46               ` Martin Schwidefsky
2010-01-05 15:59                 ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-01-05 17:03                   ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-01-05 19:58                     ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-01-06 14:59                       ` Heiko Carstens
2010-01-06 20:17                       ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-01-06 21:13                         ` Roland McGrath
2010-01-07  9:18                           ` Martin Schwidefsky
2010-01-07 17:54                             ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-01-07 21:48                               ` Roland McGrath
2010-01-21 20:51                                 ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-01-26 13:13                                   ` Martin Schwidefsky
2010-01-07 21:46                             ` Roland McGrath
2010-01-08  8:30                               ` Martin Schwidefsky
2010-01-08 10:25                                 ` Roland McGrath
2010-01-05 15:47               ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-01-05 15:50                 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2010-01-06 21:08               ` Roland McGrath
2010-01-07  9:16                 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2010-01-07 18:16                   ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-01-07 21:44                     ` Roland McGrath
2010-01-08  8:34                     ` Martin Schwidefsky
2010-01-07 21:41                   ` Roland McGrath
2010-01-07 18:11                 ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-01-06 20:23             ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2010-01-06 20:56             ` Roland McGrath
2010-01-07  9:00               ` Martin Schwidefsky
2010-01-07 21:32                 ` Roland McGrath
2010-01-21 20:32                 ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-01-05  9:26         ` Martin Schwidefsky
2010-01-06 21:15           ` Roland McGrath
2010-01-04 20:46       ` Roland McGrath
     [not found] <1158952983.251101262791902387.JavaMail.root@zmail06.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com>
2010-01-06 15:33 ` caiqian
2010-01-06 20:09   ` Oleg Nesterov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100106202347.GC26204@redhat.com \
    --to=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=caiqian@redhat.com \
    --cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=jkratoch@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=roland@redhat.com \
    --cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=utrace-devel@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox