From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>,
caiqian@redhat.com, Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
Jan Kratochvil <jkratoch@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
utrace-devel@redhat.com
Subject: Re: s390 && user_enable_single_step() (Was: odd utrace testing results on s390x)
Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2010 21:23:47 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100106202347.GC26204@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100105105030.66bb8a0a@mschwide.boeblingen.de.ibm.com>
On 01/05, Martin Schwidefsky wrote:
>
> On Mon, 4 Jan 2010 13:11:47 -0800 (PST)
> Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> > > This probably means that copy_process()->user_disable_single_step()
> > > is not enough to clear the "this task wants single-stepping" copied
> > > from parent.
> >
> > I would suspect s390's TIF_SINGLE_STEP flag here. That flag means "a
> > single-step trap occurred". This is what causes do_single_step to be
> > called before returning to user mode, rather than the machine trap doing it
> > directly as is done in the other arch implementations.
>
> Just my thinking as well.
>
> > If I'm right, then "this task wants single-stepping" is not the problem,
> > and that really is fully cleared. In fact, looking at s390's copy_thread
> > (arch/s390/kernel/process.c) it clears out all the state that is actually
> > touched by user_enable_single_step and user_disable_single_step. So for
> > s390 the new fork.c call is actually superfluous AFAICT.
>
> /* Don't copy debug registers */
> memset(&p->thread.per_info, 0, sizeof(p->thread.per_info));
>
> Yep, the call from fork.c is indeed superfluous.
I can't explain this, but if I remove copy_process()->user_disable_single_step()
the test-case below triggers "XXX" printk's from do_single_step() with or
without CONFIG_UTRACE. the patch is
--- arch/s390/kernel/traps.c~ 2009-12-22 10:41:52.909174198 -0500
+++ arch/s390/kernel/traps.c 2010-01-05 11:03:55.006487697 -0500
@@ -384,6 +384,9 @@ void __kprobes do_single_step(struct pt_
}
if (tracehook_consider_fatal_signal(current, SIGTRAP))
force_sig(SIGTRAP, current);
+ else
+ printk("XXX: %s/%d %d\n", current->comm, current->pid,
+ test_thread_flag(TIF_SINGLE_STEP));
}
static void default_trap_handler(struct pt_regs * regs, long interruption_code)
Oleg.
#include <stdio.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <signal.h>
#include <sys/ptrace.h>
#include <sys/wait.h>
#include <assert.h>
int main(void)
{
int pid, status;
if (!(pid = fork())) {
assert(ptrace(PTRACE_TRACEME) == 0);
kill(getpid(), SIGSTOP);
if (!fork())
return 43;
wait(&status);
return WEXITSTATUS(status);
}
for (;;) {
assert(pid == wait(&status));
if (WIFEXITED(status))
break;
assert(ptrace(PTRACE_SINGLESTEP, pid, 0,0) == 0);
}
assert(WEXITSTATUS(status) == 43);
return 0;
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-01-06 20:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1503844142.2061111261478093776.JavaMail.root@zmail06.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com>
[not found] ` <1257887498.2061171261478252049.JavaMail.root@zmail06.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com>
2010-01-04 15:52 ` s390 && user_enable_single_step() (Was: odd utrace testing results on s390x) Oleg Nesterov
2010-01-04 16:16 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2010-01-04 18:14 ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-01-04 19:30 ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-01-04 21:11 ` Roland McGrath
2010-01-05 9:50 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2010-01-05 15:36 ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-01-05 15:46 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2010-01-05 15:59 ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-01-05 17:03 ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-01-05 19:58 ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-01-06 14:59 ` Heiko Carstens
2010-01-06 20:17 ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-01-06 21:13 ` Roland McGrath
2010-01-07 9:18 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2010-01-07 17:54 ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-01-07 21:48 ` Roland McGrath
2010-01-21 20:51 ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-01-26 13:13 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2010-01-07 21:46 ` Roland McGrath
2010-01-08 8:30 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2010-01-08 10:25 ` Roland McGrath
2010-01-05 15:47 ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-01-05 15:50 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2010-01-06 21:08 ` Roland McGrath
2010-01-07 9:16 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2010-01-07 18:16 ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-01-07 21:44 ` Roland McGrath
2010-01-08 8:34 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2010-01-07 21:41 ` Roland McGrath
2010-01-07 18:11 ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-01-06 20:23 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2010-01-06 20:56 ` Roland McGrath
2010-01-07 9:00 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2010-01-07 21:32 ` Roland McGrath
2010-01-21 20:32 ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-01-05 9:26 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2010-01-06 21:15 ` Roland McGrath
2010-01-04 20:46 ` Roland McGrath
[not found] <1158952983.251101262791902387.JavaMail.root@zmail06.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com>
2010-01-06 15:33 ` caiqian
2010-01-06 20:09 ` Oleg Nesterov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100106202347.GC26204@redhat.com \
--to=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=caiqian@redhat.com \
--cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
--cc=jkratoch@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=roland@redhat.com \
--cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
--cc=utrace-devel@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox