Re: Re:

Matt Mackall
2009-11-27T22:55:14Z

On Thu, 2009-11-26 at 11:48 +0000, Ian Molton wrote:
> Matt Mackall wrote:
> > On Thu, 2009-11-26 at 10:49 +0000, Ian Molton wrote:
> >> Hi guys,
> >>
> >
> > No need to pass rng_buffer to the helper as there's only one with global
> > scope.
>
> Ah, sorry, I see what you mean now. The logic behind that is that it
> matches the new API, whcih is all that will be left once the old drivers
> are patched to use it. I planned to drop the helper altogether at that
> point and though it'd make the patch more readable when that happens.

Ok, that's quite reasonable.

> Is this enough to get an acked-by: ? If so, I'll do that and see about
> getting the change into linux-next.

Acked-by: Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com>

You should probably go through Herbert's tree to get into -next,
hopefully he won't be too miffed by your repeated failure to cc:
linux-kernel initially and failure to cc: him here..

--
http://selenic.com : development and support for Mercurial and Linux