From: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@in.ibm.com>
To: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"stable@kernel.org" <stable@kernel.org>,
Gary Hade <garyhade@us.ibm.com>,
Chris McDermott <lcm@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Make Intel 8-way Xeons boot again
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2010 10:12:06 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100113044206.GA24940@in.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1263336361.2854.851.camel@sbs-t61.sc.intel.com>
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 02:46:00PM -0800, Suresh Siddha wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-01-09 at 18:30 -0800, Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli wrote:
> > Linux version 2.6.33-rc3-bsect (ananth@llm69.in.ibm.com) (gcc version 4.1.2 20080704 (Red Hat 4.1.2-46)) #1 SMP Sun Jan 10 07:36:02 IST 2010
> > Command line: ro root=LABEL=/ rhgb console=tty0 console=ttyS0,9600n1 apic=debug
> > BIOS-provided physical RAM map:
> > BIOS-e820: 0000000000000000 - 000000000009bc00 (usable)
> > BIOS-e820: 000000000009bc00 - 00000000000a0000 (reserved)
> > BIOS-e820: 00000000000e0000 - 0000000000100000 (reserved)
> > BIOS-e820: 0000000000100000 - 00000000bff4b480 (usable)
> > BIOS-e820: 00000000bff4b480 - 00000000bff57b40 (ACPI data)
> > BIOS-e820: 00000000bff57b40 - 00000000c0000000 (reserved)
> > BIOS-e820: 00000000d0000000 - 00000000e0000000 (reserved)
> > BIOS-e820: 00000000fec00000 - 0000000100000000 (reserved)
> > BIOS-e820: 0000000100000000 - 0000000840000000 (usable)
> > NX (Execute Disable) protection: active
> > DMI 2.4 present.
> > No AGP bridge found
> > last_pfn = 0x840000 max_arch_pfn = 0x400000000
> > x86 PAT enabled: cpu 0, old 0x7040600070406, new 0x7010600070106
> > last_pfn = 0xbff4b max_arch_pfn = 0x400000000
> > Scan SMP from ffff880000000000 for 1024 bytes.
> > Scan SMP from ffff88000009fc00 for 1024 bytes.
> > Scan SMP from ffff8800000f0000 for 65536 bytes.
> > Scan SMP from ffff88000009bc00 for 1024 bytes.
> > found SMP MP-table at [ffff88000009bd40] 9bd40
> > mpc: 9d920-9dc84
> > init_memory_mapping: 0000000000000000-00000000bff4b000
> > init_memory_mapping: 0000000100000000-0000000840000000
> > RAMDISK: 37d4d000 - 37fef9e3
> > ACPI: RSDP 000000000009bde0 00014 (v00 M IB)
> > ACPI: RSDT 00000000bff57ac0 00044 (v01 IBM EXA01ZEU 00001000 IBM 45444F43)
> > ACPI: FACP 00000000bff57900 000F4 (v03 IBM EXA01ZEU 00001000 IBM 45444F43)
> > ACPI: DSDT 00000000bff4b480 021B5 (v01 IBM EXA01ZEU 00001000 INTL 20060707)
> > ACPI: FACS 00000000bff53780 00040
> > ACPI: APIC 00000000bff57800 000F4 (v01 IBM EXA01ZEU 00001000 IBM 45444F43)
>
> Ananth, This is an IBM EXA system using hurricane chipset.
>
> And from http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/redbooks/pdfs/sg247630.pdf page
> 106, what is referred to as "special mode" in that page is the xapic's
> logical flat mode and what is referred as "logical mode" on that page is
> the xapic's logical cluster mode. And that page says that the logical
> mode is not used on x3850 M2 / x3950 M2 (it is not very clear to me that
> if the logical flat mode is fundamentally broken or not. but from your
> data and from this page, it looks like it).
>
> In the past (long time back which predates x86_64 architecture)
> hurricane systems had issues with flat mode and hence 32bit architecture
> uses summit-specific code to handle this platform.
>
> /* Hook from generic ACPI tables.c */
> static int summit_acpi_madt_oem_check(char *oem_id, char *oem_table_id)
> {
> if (!strncmp(oem_id, "IBM", 3) &&
> (!strncmp(oem_table_id, "SERVIGIL", 8)
> || !strncmp(oem_table_id, "EXA", 3))){
> mark_tsc_unstable("Summit based system");
> use_cyclone = 1; /*enable cyclone-timer*/
> setup_summit();
> return 1;
> }
> return 0;
> }
>
> So I think if you boot today's 32bit kernel on this platform, it will
> use this summit specific code which doesn't use logical flat mode.
>
> I think we were just lucky why we haven't run into this problem before
> in 64-bit kernels.
>
> Even with the existing code (after yesterday's revert by Linus), if all
> the apic id's happen to be less than or equal to 8, then 64-bit kernel
> will use flat mode again and that will cause an issue on your system
> again.
Thank you for the extensive analysis Suresh.
> Can you please check internally if the logical flat mode is broken on
> this platform and if so, either kernel need to have a summit specific
> check on 64bit too (just like 32bit) and not use flat mode or have the
> bios on your platform set the ACPI_FADT_APIC_PHYSICAL fadt flag set.
> Then the kernel will use physical mode irrespective of number of cpu's
> or their apic id's.
I have already sounded Chris McDermott, our System X platform person
about this issue. Chris should be able to give us more concrete answers
to your queries.
Ananth
prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-01-13 4:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-01-09 10:10 [PATCH] Make Intel 8-way Xeons boot again Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli
2010-01-09 18:11 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-01-09 22:51 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-01-11 17:38 ` Suresh Siddha
2010-01-09 21:13 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-01-10 2:30 ` Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli
2010-01-10 6:35 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-01-10 10:26 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-01-11 4:53 ` [PATCH] Revert 2fbd07a5f so machines with BSPs phsyical apic id != 0 can boot Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli
2010-01-11 21:39 ` Suresh Siddha
2010-01-11 22:55 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-01-11 23:45 ` Suresh Siddha
2010-01-11 23:51 ` Suresh Siddha
2010-01-12 0:46 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-01-12 0:50 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-01-12 2:27 ` Suresh Siddha
2010-01-14 0:03 ` Yuhong Bao
2010-01-11 21:43 ` [PATCH] Make Intel 8-way Xeons boot again Yinghai Lu
2010-01-11 21:53 ` Suresh Siddha
2010-01-12 19:10 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-01-12 20:20 ` Suresh Siddha
2010-01-12 21:02 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-01-12 21:07 ` Suresh Siddha
2010-01-12 22:46 ` Suresh Siddha
2010-01-13 4:42 ` Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100113044206.GA24940@in.ibm.com \
--to=ananth@in.ibm.com \
--cc=garyhade@us.ibm.com \
--cc=lcm@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=stable@kernel.org \
--cc=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=yhlu.kernel@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox