From: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>,
Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
"ananth@in.ibm.com" <ananth@in.ibm.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -v2 5/5] x86: use dmi check to treat disabled cpus as hotplug cpus.
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 00:52:14 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100113235214.GG24818@basil.fritz.box> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4B4E5390.1070004@zytor.com>
> I just built an allyesconfig kernel, and it has 1904K of percpu data.
> 1791K of that is in per_cpu__cpu_lock_stats. So everything else is
Ok so we need to fix lock stats, I'll put it on my todo list.
> ~113K. Still. We should not be restricted from doing legitimately
> large percpu allocations because of ghost cpus (and Tejun knows my
> position on this), but it doesn't sound like the house is burning, either.
I think it's legitimate to require explicit allocation on
add/remove event for anything large.
Static per cpu is really only for "lazy users" anyways.
-Andi
--
ak@linux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-01-13 23:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-01-12 23:17 [PATCH 0/5] clean up logical flat apic mode using Yinghai Lu
2010-01-12 23:17 ` [PATCH -v2 1/5] use nr_cpus= to set nr_cpu_ids early Yinghai Lu
2010-01-12 23:17 ` [PATCH 2/5] x86: using logical flat for amd cpu too Yinghai Lu
2010-01-12 23:17 ` [PATCH -v2 3/5] x86: according to nr_cpu_ids to decide if need to leave logical flat Yinghai Lu
2010-01-12 23:17 ` [PATCH -v2 5/5] x86: use dmi check to treat disabled cpus as hotplug cpus Yinghai Lu
2010-01-12 23:56 ` Suresh Siddha
2010-01-13 0:05 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-01-13 1:48 ` Suresh Siddha
2010-01-13 1:55 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-01-13 2:06 ` Suresh Siddha
2010-01-13 2:13 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-01-13 2:21 ` Suresh Siddha
2010-01-13 2:26 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-01-13 21:46 ` Andi Kleen
2010-01-13 22:00 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-01-13 22:23 ` Andi Kleen
2010-01-13 22:27 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-01-13 22:29 ` Suresh Siddha
2010-01-13 22:36 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-01-13 22:49 ` Suresh Siddha
2010-01-13 23:02 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-01-13 23:13 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-01-13 23:52 ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2010-01-14 9:25 ` Andi Kleen
2010-01-12 23:17 ` [PATCH 4/5] x86: make 32bit apic flat to physflat switch like 64bit Yinghai Lu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100113235214.GG24818@basil.fritz.box \
--to=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ananth@in.ibm.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox