public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alex Chiang <achiang@hp.com>
To: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru>,
	Kenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/11] pci: reject mmio range start from 0 on pci_bridge read
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2010 21:20:10 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100116042010.GD22215@ldl.fc.hp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1263609721-3921-4-git-send-email-yinghai@kernel.org>

Please change title of patch to:

	pci: pci_read_bridge_bases rejects MMIO ranges starting at 0

* Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>:
> that is wrong.
> 
> exposed by that patch that doesn's shrink pci bridge res.

Ok, I don't understand how this patch interacts with patch 4/11.
Am I correct in understanding that something in 4/11 exposes a
problem that 3/11 fixes?

I'm just looking for a better explanation of *why* we need this
patch here.

> -v2: change to "bar reading" to "reg reading"
> 
> Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
> ---
>  drivers/pci/probe.c |   18 +++++++++++++++---
>  1 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/probe.c b/drivers/pci/probe.c
> index 11824d7..70b1f74 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/probe.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/probe.c
> @@ -316,13 +316,17 @@ void __devinit pci_read_bridge_bases(struct pci_bus *child)
>  		limit |= (io_limit_hi << 16);
>  	}
>  
> -	if (base <= limit) {
> +	if (base <= limit && base) {

This construct (and the similar one below) is a little
non-idiomatic.

	if (base && base <= limit)

reads a lot more naturally to me.

thanks,
/ac

  reply	other threads:[~2010-01-16  4:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-01-16  2:41 [PATCH 00/11] pci: update pci bridge resources Yinghai Lu
2010-01-16  2:41 ` [PATCH 01/11] pci: add pci_bridge_release_unused_res and pci_bus_release_unused_bridge_res Yinghai Lu
2010-01-16  3:57   ` Alex Chiang
2010-01-16 10:10     ` Yinghai Lu
2010-01-16  2:41 ` [PATCH 02/11] pci: add failed_list to record failed one for pci_bus_assign_resources Yinghai Lu
2010-01-16  4:05   ` Alex Chiang
2010-01-16  2:41 ` [PATCH 03/11] pci: reject mmio range start from 0 on pci_bridge read Yinghai Lu
2010-01-16  4:20   ` Alex Chiang [this message]
2010-01-16  2:41 ` [PATCH 04/11] pci: don't shrink bridge resources Yinghai Lu
2010-01-16  2:41 ` [PATCH 05/11] pci: update bridge res to get more big range in pci assign unssign Yinghai Lu
2010-01-16  4:38   ` Alex Chiang
2010-01-16  2:41 ` [PATCH 06/11] pci: introduce pci_assign_unassigned_bridge_resources Yinghai Lu
2010-01-16  4:47   ` Alex Chiang
2010-01-16  2:41 ` [PATCH 07/11] pci: pciehp clean flow in pciehp_configure_device Yinghai Lu
2010-01-16  2:41 ` [PATCH 08/11] pci: pciehp second try to get big range for pcie devices Yinghai Lu
2010-01-16  4:52   ` Alex Chiang
2010-01-16  2:41 ` [PATCH 09/11] pci: pci_bridge_release_res Yinghai Lu
2010-01-16  4:57   ` Alex Chiang
2010-01-16  2:42 ` [PATCH 10/11] pciehp: add support for bridge resource reallocation Yinghai Lu
2010-01-16  4:59   ` Alex Chiang
2010-01-16  5:22     ` Yinghai Lu
2010-01-16  9:34     ` Yinghai Lu
2010-01-16 23:14       ` Bjorn Helgaas
2010-01-17 17:34         ` Jesse Barnes
2010-01-17 22:35           ` Yinghai Lu
2010-01-16  2:42 ` [PATCH 11/11] pci: set PCI_PREF_RANGE_TYPE_64 in pci_bridge_check_ranges Yinghai Lu
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-01-16 11:07 [PATCH 00/11] pci: update pci bridge resources Yinghai Lu
2010-01-16 11:07 ` [PATCH 03/11] pci: reject mmio range start from 0 on pci_bridge read Yinghai Lu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100116042010.GD22215@ldl.fc.hp.com \
    --to=achiang@hp.com \
    --cc=bjorn.helgaas@hp.com \
    --cc=ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru \
    --cc=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
    --cc=kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox