From: Alex Chiang <achiang@hp.com>
To: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru>,
Kenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/11] pci: reject mmio range start from 0 on pci_bridge read
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2010 21:20:10 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100116042010.GD22215@ldl.fc.hp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1263609721-3921-4-git-send-email-yinghai@kernel.org>
Please change title of patch to:
pci: pci_read_bridge_bases rejects MMIO ranges starting at 0
* Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>:
> that is wrong.
>
> exposed by that patch that doesn's shrink pci bridge res.
Ok, I don't understand how this patch interacts with patch 4/11.
Am I correct in understanding that something in 4/11 exposes a
problem that 3/11 fixes?
I'm just looking for a better explanation of *why* we need this
patch here.
> -v2: change to "bar reading" to "reg reading"
>
> Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
> ---
> drivers/pci/probe.c | 18 +++++++++++++++---
> 1 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/probe.c b/drivers/pci/probe.c
> index 11824d7..70b1f74 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/probe.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/probe.c
> @@ -316,13 +316,17 @@ void __devinit pci_read_bridge_bases(struct pci_bus *child)
> limit |= (io_limit_hi << 16);
> }
>
> - if (base <= limit) {
> + if (base <= limit && base) {
This construct (and the similar one below) is a little
non-idiomatic.
if (base && base <= limit)
reads a lot more naturally to me.
thanks,
/ac
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-01-16 4:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-01-16 2:41 [PATCH 00/11] pci: update pci bridge resources Yinghai Lu
2010-01-16 2:41 ` [PATCH 01/11] pci: add pci_bridge_release_unused_res and pci_bus_release_unused_bridge_res Yinghai Lu
2010-01-16 3:57 ` Alex Chiang
2010-01-16 10:10 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-01-16 2:41 ` [PATCH 02/11] pci: add failed_list to record failed one for pci_bus_assign_resources Yinghai Lu
2010-01-16 4:05 ` Alex Chiang
2010-01-16 2:41 ` [PATCH 03/11] pci: reject mmio range start from 0 on pci_bridge read Yinghai Lu
2010-01-16 4:20 ` Alex Chiang [this message]
2010-01-16 2:41 ` [PATCH 04/11] pci: don't shrink bridge resources Yinghai Lu
2010-01-16 2:41 ` [PATCH 05/11] pci: update bridge res to get more big range in pci assign unssign Yinghai Lu
2010-01-16 4:38 ` Alex Chiang
2010-01-16 2:41 ` [PATCH 06/11] pci: introduce pci_assign_unassigned_bridge_resources Yinghai Lu
2010-01-16 4:47 ` Alex Chiang
2010-01-16 2:41 ` [PATCH 07/11] pci: pciehp clean flow in pciehp_configure_device Yinghai Lu
2010-01-16 2:41 ` [PATCH 08/11] pci: pciehp second try to get big range for pcie devices Yinghai Lu
2010-01-16 4:52 ` Alex Chiang
2010-01-16 2:41 ` [PATCH 09/11] pci: pci_bridge_release_res Yinghai Lu
2010-01-16 4:57 ` Alex Chiang
2010-01-16 2:42 ` [PATCH 10/11] pciehp: add support for bridge resource reallocation Yinghai Lu
2010-01-16 4:59 ` Alex Chiang
2010-01-16 5:22 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-01-16 9:34 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-01-16 23:14 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2010-01-17 17:34 ` Jesse Barnes
2010-01-17 22:35 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-01-16 2:42 ` [PATCH 11/11] pci: set PCI_PREF_RANGE_TYPE_64 in pci_bridge_check_ranges Yinghai Lu
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-01-16 11:07 [PATCH 00/11] pci: update pci bridge resources Yinghai Lu
2010-01-16 11:07 ` [PATCH 03/11] pci: reject mmio range start from 0 on pci_bridge read Yinghai Lu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100116042010.GD22215@ldl.fc.hp.com \
--to=achiang@hp.com \
--cc=bjorn.helgaas@hp.com \
--cc=ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru \
--cc=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
--cc=kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox