From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
To: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@elte.hu, paulus@samba.org,
davem@davemloft.net, perfmon2-devel@lists.sf.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf_events: improve x86 event scheduling
Date: Sun, 17 Jan 2010 15:12:35 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100117141233.GF5035@nowhere> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bd4cb8901001130922s7ad85af6w6c631d90de177ef9@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 06:22:54PM +0100, Stephane Eranian wrote:
> Ok,
>
> Something like that should problably do it:
>
> static void event_sched_out(struct perf_event *event, int cpu)
> {
> event->state = PERF_EVENT_STATE_INACTIVE;
> event->oncpu = -1;
> }
You need to also call pmu->disable() if it is a software event,
because a breakpoint needs to be unregistered in hardware level
too.
And disable it in x86 level if it is an x86 event?
> hw_perf_group_sched_in()
> {
> ....
> n = 1;
> list_for_each_entry(sub, &leader->sibling_list, group_entry) {
> if (sub->state > PERF_EVENT_STATE_OFF) {
> ret = event_sched_in(sub, cpu);
> if (ret)
> goto undo;
Yeah we indeed really need to check that.
Thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-01-17 14:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-01-12 10:50 [PATCH] perf_events: improve x86 event scheduling Stephane Eranian
2010-01-12 16:10 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-01-13 9:54 ` Stephane Eranian
2010-01-13 16:29 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-01-13 16:52 ` Stephane Eranian
2010-01-13 17:22 ` Stephane Eranian
2010-01-17 14:12 ` Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
2010-01-17 14:42 ` Stephane Eranian
2010-01-17 16:19 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-01-17 21:53 ` Stephane Eranian
2010-01-18 11:13 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-01-18 11:53 ` [PATCH] perf: fix the is_software_event() definition Peter Zijlstra
2010-01-18 12:07 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-01-18 12:19 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-01-18 13:46 ` [perfmon2] " stephane eranian
2010-01-18 12:57 ` stephane eranian
2010-01-18 13:06 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-01-18 12:53 ` stephane eranian
2010-01-18 13:00 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100117141233.GF5035@nowhere \
--to=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=perfmon2-devel@lists.sf.net \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox