From: Clark Williams <williams@redhat.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: RT <linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Carsten Emde <ce@ceag.ch>,
John Kacur <jkacur@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: RFC: NUMA modifications to cyclictest
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2010 07:37:34 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100120073734.4be7a52b@torg> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1001200741000.2906@localhost.localdomain>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1986 bytes --]
On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 07:51:41 +0100 (CET)
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Jan 2010, Clark Williams wrote:
> > RT-ers,
> >
> > Lately we've been struggling with some performance issues on high-core
> > count (>16 cores) NUMA machines with the RT kernel. During the course
> > of troubleshooting this issue, we tried using the 'numactl' program to
> > constrain our measurement testing tool (rteval) to a particular memory
> > node, rather than letting everything float. Doing so showed marked
> > improvement in both max latency and jitter. While this doesn't solve
> > our performance problems I thought it might make sense to have a --numa
> > mode for cylictest that compliments the --smp mode just added.
> >
> > The big difference here is that when using --numa, each measurement
> > thread (one per cpu) has it's stack allocated from the memory node
> > associated with it's cpu. Also, the major data structures for each
> > thread (parameter block, statistics block and histogram) are allocated
> > from the appropriate node. This is done with calls into libnuma,
> > which means this will add a dependency on libnuma.
>
> That might cause some trouble for embedded folks. :(
Yeah, that's why I send the RFC, wanted to see who would hate me for
it :).
Carsten already told me off-list that one of his build machines didn't
have numa.h, so I'm going to have to rearrange the build a bit.
As much as I hate to say it, I think the best option is to use autoconf
to detect if libnuma is available on the build platform and to take
appropriate steps if it's not.
The other idea I toyed with was dynamic loading of libnuma so there's
not an install dependency for the libnuma package with the rt-tests
package. I only use five functions from libnuma, so that's not too bad
a set of function pointers to manage. Hmmm, that probably won't work
very well, since I'll still have to include numa.h. Sigh...
Clark
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-01-20 13:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-01-19 23:14 RFC: NUMA modifications to cyclictest Clark Williams
2010-01-20 6:51 ` Thomas Gleixner
2010-01-20 13:37 ` Clark Williams [this message]
2010-01-20 15:54 ` Nikita V. Youshchenko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100120073734.4be7a52b@torg \
--to=williams@redhat.com \
--cc=ce@ceag.ch \
--cc=jkacur@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox