The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@amd64.org>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: mingo@elte.hu, tglx@linutronix.de, andreas.herrmann3@amd.com,
	x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] x86, cacheinfo: Fix disabling of L3 cache indexes
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2010 17:30:48 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100121163048.GB10321@aftab> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4B578C0E.5090709@zytor.com>

On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 03:04:46PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 01/19/2010 03:07 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> >  
> > +static void __wbinvd(void *dummy)
> > +{
> > +	asm volatile("wbinvd" : : : "memory");
> > +}
> > +
> 
> [...]
> 
> > +	smp_call_function_single(cpu, __wbinvd, NULL, 1);
> 
> I really don't like this combination.
> 
> First of all, it's an asm version of an instruction we already have
> macros for.  This should probably just be wbinvd(), or *possibly*
> native_wbinvd(), although that would have to be justified -- especially
> since the preexisting code used wbinvd().

The preexisting code using wbinvd is a bug since wbinvd has to happen on
a core which contains the L3 cache whose indices(!) we disable.

But yeah, a wbinvd smp version is a bit problematic since
smp_call_function_* expects a function pointer which has a void *
argument but native_wbinvd() has no args. By the way, there's a similar
thing in <drivers/char/agp/intel-agp.c::do_wbinvd()>

> Second, it's pretty obvious that the only reason for this function at
> all is to provide a wrapper that can be passed to smp_call_function*().
>  It would be a lot cleaner to have a small function wbinvd_on_cpu(cpu)
> as a wrapper for the higher-order functionality.

Done, see my next patch series.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.

-
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
Operating Systems Research Center

  reply	other threads:[~2010-01-21 16:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-01-19 11:07 [PATCH 0/3] x86, cacheinfo, amd: L3 Cache Index Disable fixes Borislav Petkov
2010-01-19 11:07 ` [PATCH 1/3] x86, cacheinfo: Fix disabling of L3 cache indexes Borislav Petkov
2010-01-20 23:04   ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-01-21 16:30     ` Borislav Petkov [this message]
2010-01-21 18:21       ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-01-19 11:07 ` [PATCH 2/3] x86, cacheinfo: Add cache index disable sysfs attrs only to L3 caches Borislav Petkov
2010-01-19 11:07 ` [PATCH 3/3] x86, cacheinfo: Calculate L3 indexes Borislav Petkov
2010-01-20 23:15   ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-01-21 16:31     ` Borislav Petkov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100121163048.GB10321@aftab \
    --to=bp@amd64.org \
    --cc=andreas.herrmann3@amd.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox