From: Borislav Petkov <bp@amd64.org>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: mingo@elte.hu, tglx@linutronix.de, andreas.herrmann3@amd.com,
x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] x86, smp: Adjust native_wbinvd for smp_call_function-helpers
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2010 19:36:53 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100121183653.GA14808@aftab> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4B5897F7.5000008@zytor.com>
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 10:07:51AM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 01/21/2010 08:41 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > From: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com>
> >
> > Add a wbinvd_on_cpu() helper and fold the void * arg in the wbinvd macro
> > definition so that native_wbinvd can be used in the smp_call_function_*
> > helpers as a pointed-to function.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com>
>
> This patch is a lot of extra uglification just to avoid a simple jump
> stub -- and even then only with PV enabled -- for an operation which is
> then going to perform an IPI and WBINVD. That doesn't exactly seem like
> the right tradeoff.
>
> As such, I'm going to request that you just put a simple stub function
> in lib/smp.c rather than this whole patchset (well, the smp.h bit
> obviously needs to stay.)
..and I was wrapping the wrong way: wbinvd() was going to hide the void
* function argument while a simple stub in lib/smp.c could wrap around
wbinvd() which is much more cleaner. Thanks.
Will redo the patchset tomorrow.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
-
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
Operating Systems Research Center
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-01-21 18:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-01-21 16:41 [PATCH -v2 0/7] x86, cacheinfo, amd: L3 Cache Index Disable fixes Borislav Petkov
2010-01-21 16:41 ` [PATCH 1/7] x86, smp: Convert msr-smp.c to an smp library Borislav Petkov
2010-01-21 18:08 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-01-21 16:41 ` [PATCH 2/7] x86, smp: Adjust native_wbinvd for smp_call_function-helpers Borislav Petkov
2010-01-21 18:07 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-01-21 18:36 ` Borislav Petkov [this message]
2010-01-21 16:41 ` [PATCH 3/7] x86, smp: Add wbinvd_on_all_cpus helper Borislav Petkov
2010-01-21 16:41 ` [PATCH 4/7] intel-agp: Switch to wbinvd_on_all_cpus Borislav Petkov
2010-01-21 16:41 ` [PATCH 5/7] x86, cacheinfo: Fix disabling of L3 cache indices Borislav Petkov
2010-01-21 16:41 ` [PATCH 6/7] x86, cacheinfo: Add cache index disable sysfs attrs only to L3 caches Borislav Petkov
2010-01-21 16:41 ` [PATCH 7/7] x86, cacheinfo: Calculate L3 indexes Borislav Petkov
2010-01-21 17:57 ` [PATCH] x86, cacheinfo: Calculate L3 indices Borislav Petkov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100121183653.GA14808@aftab \
--to=bp@amd64.org \
--cc=andreas.herrmann3@amd.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox