From: Dimitri Sivanich <sivanich@sgi.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jack Steiner <steiner@sgi.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
tglx@linutronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86, UV: Fix RTC latency bug by reading replicated cachelines
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2010 09:40:06 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100122154006.GA4975@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100120081020.GG20621@elte.hu>
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 09:10:20AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Dimitri Sivanich <sivanich@sgi.com> wrote:
>
> > +++ linux/drivers/char/uv_mmtimer.c 2010-01-14 11:56:57.000000000 -0600
> > @@ -89,12 +89,19 @@ static long uv_mmtimer_ioctl(struct file
> > switch (cmd) {
> > case MMTIMER_GETOFFSET: /* offset of the counter */
> > /*
> > - * UV RTC register is on its own page
> > + * Starting with HUB rev 2.0, the UV RTC register is
> > + * replicated across all cachelines of it's own page.
> > + * This allows faster simultaneous reads from a given socket.
> > + *
> > + * The offset returned is in 64 bit units.
> > */
> > - if (PAGE_SIZE <= (1 << 16))
> > - ret = ((UV_LOCAL_MMR_BASE | UVH_RTC) & (PAGE_SIZE-1))
> > - / 8;
> > - else
> > + if (PAGE_SIZE <= (1 << 16)) {
> > + if (uv_get_min_hub_revision_id() == 1)
> > + ret = 0;
> > + else
> > + ret = ((uv_blade_processor_id() *
> > + L1_CACHE_BYTES) % PAGE_SIZE) / 8;
> > + } else
>
> That 64K PAGE_SIZE check in the ioctl looks rather weird. What is the purpose
> of it?
Checking for > 64k pages is really a holdover from similar code on ia64. I've taken it out with a modified version of this patch that I'll send shortly.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-01-22 15:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-01-12 21:09 [PATCH] x86, UV: Add function retrieving node controller revision number Jack Steiner
2010-01-13 9:24 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-01-14 18:34 ` [PATCH] x86, UV: Read RTC using replicated cachelines Dimitri Sivanich
2010-01-19 14:41 ` [PATCH] x86, UV: Fix RTC latency bug by reading " Dimitri Sivanich
2010-01-20 8:10 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-01-22 15:40 ` Dimitri Sivanich [this message]
2010-01-22 15:41 ` Dimitri Sivanich
2010-01-27 13:17 ` [tip:x86/urgent] " tip-bot for Dimitri Sivanich
2010-01-15 19:24 ` [tip:x86/urgent] x86, uv: Add function retrieving node controller revision number tip-bot for Jack Steiner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100122154006.GA4975@sgi.com \
--to=sivanich@sgi.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=steiner@sgi.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox