From: "Leo (Hao) Chen" <leochen@broadcom.com>
To: "Roel Kluin" <roel.kluin@gmail.com>
Cc: "Scott Branden" <sbranden@broadcom.com>,
"linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org" <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mtd: hot spin and code duplication in nand_bcm_umi_bch_read_oobEcc()
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2010 14:04:10 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100122220410.GN12439@broadcom.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4B5A172C.2010609@gmail.com>
Thanks for identifying the NumToRead bug.
Tested on board. Works.
Acked-by: Leo Chen <leochen@broadcom.com>
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 01:22:52PM -0800, Roel Kluin wrote:
> In the branch where pagesize equalled NAND_DATA_ACCESS_SIZE, NumToRead
> wasn't decremented in the `while (numToRead > 11)' loop.
> Also the first and last while loops were duplicated in both branches.
>
> Signed-off-by: Roel Kluin <roel.kluin@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/mtd/nand/nand_bcm_umi.h | 71 ++++++++++++++-------------------------
> 1 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_bcm_umi.h b/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_bcm_umi.h
> index 7cec2cd..198b304 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_bcm_umi.h
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_bcm_umi.h
> @@ -167,18 +167,27 @@ static inline void nand_bcm_umi_bch_read_oobEcc(uint32_t pageSize,
> int numToRead = 16; /* There are 16 bytes per sector in the OOB */
>
> /* ECC is already paused when this function is called */
> + if (pageSize != NAND_DATA_ACCESS_SIZE) {
> + /* skip BI */
> +#if defined(__KERNEL__) && !defined(STANDALONE)
> + *oobp++ = REG_NAND_DATA8;
> +#else
> + REG_NAND_DATA8;
> +#endif
> + numToRead--;
> + }
>
> - if (pageSize == NAND_DATA_ACCESS_SIZE) {
> - while (numToRead > numEccBytes) {
> - /* skip free oob region */
> + while (numToRead > numEccBytes) {
> + /* skip free oob region */
> #if defined(__KERNEL__) && !defined(STANDALONE)
> - *oobp++ = REG_NAND_DATA8;
> + *oobp++ = REG_NAND_DATA8;
> #else
> - REG_NAND_DATA8;
> + REG_NAND_DATA8;
> #endif
> - numToRead--;
> - }
> + numToRead--;
> + }
>
> + if (pageSize == NAND_DATA_ACCESS_SIZE) {
> /* read ECC bytes before BI */
> nand_bcm_umi_bch_resume_read_ecc_calc();
>
> @@ -190,6 +199,7 @@ static inline void nand_bcm_umi_bch_read_oobEcc(uint32_t pageSize,
> #else
> eccCalc[eccPos++] = REG_NAND_DATA8;
> #endif
> + numToRead--;
> }
>
> nand_bcm_umi_bch_pause_read_ecc_calc();
> @@ -204,49 +214,18 @@ static inline void nand_bcm_umi_bch_read_oobEcc(uint32_t pageSize,
> numToRead--;
> }
>
> - /* read ECC bytes */
> - nand_bcm_umi_bch_resume_read_ecc_calc();
> - while (numToRead) {
> -#if defined(__KERNEL__) && !defined(STANDALONE)
> - *oobp = REG_NAND_DATA8;
> - eccCalc[eccPos++] = *oobp;
> - oobp++;
> -#else
> - eccCalc[eccPos++] = REG_NAND_DATA8;
> -#endif
> - numToRead--;
> - }
> - } else {
> - /* skip BI */
> + }
> + /* read ECC bytes */
> + nand_bcm_umi_bch_resume_read_ecc_calc();
> + while (numToRead) {
> #if defined(__KERNEL__) && !defined(STANDALONE)
> - *oobp++ = REG_NAND_DATA8;
> + *oobp = REG_NAND_DATA8;
> + eccCalc[eccPos++] = *oobp;
> + oobp++;
> #else
> - REG_NAND_DATA8;
> + eccCalc[eccPos++] = REG_NAND_DATA8;
> #endif
> numToRead--;
> -
> - while (numToRead > numEccBytes) {
> - /* skip free oob region */
> -#if defined(__KERNEL__) && !defined(STANDALONE)
> - *oobp++ = REG_NAND_DATA8;
> -#else
> - REG_NAND_DATA8;
> -#endif
> - numToRead--;
> - }
> -
> - /* read ECC bytes */
> - nand_bcm_umi_bch_resume_read_ecc_calc();
> - while (numToRead) {
> -#if defined(__KERNEL__) && !defined(STANDALONE)
> - *oobp = REG_NAND_DATA8;
> - eccCalc[eccPos++] = *oobp;
> - oobp++;
> -#else
> - eccCalc[eccPos++] = REG_NAND_DATA8;
> -#endif
> - numToRead--;
> - }
> }
> }
>
>
--
Leo Hao Chen
------------------------
Life is short, run long.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-01-22 22:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-01-22 21:22 [PATCH] mtd: hot spin and code duplication in nand_bcm_umi_bch_read_oobEcc() Roel Kluin
2010-01-22 22:04 ` Leo (Hao) Chen [this message]
2010-02-03 16:22 ` Artem Bityutskiy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100122220410.GN12439@broadcom.com \
--to=leochen@broadcom.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=roel.kluin@gmail.com \
--cc=sbranden@broadcom.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox